<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] ICANN and Ethics
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN and Ethics
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:51:33 +0000
FYI, I have just published a rather lengthy opinion piece title "ICANN and
Ethics" at CircleID.com -- http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_and_ethics/
I began working on this shortly after last month's Washington Post "revolving
door" story, and it has been through multiple edits. The article notes that the
views expressed therein are solely my own and not those of any client,
including ICA.
The piece is very careful not to allege that anyone associated with ICANN has
acted in an unethical manner. However, it does take the position that the
business community generally benefits from its multi-stakeholder model rather
than a governmental regulator under UN auspices; that ethical questions about
ICANN threaten its independence and perhaps even survival in a period of
multiple major challenges; that its present ethics policy is narrow and
outdated; and that the Board should proactively undertake an initiative to
update and improve its ethics policies. In passing, I also note that many
parties beyond "contracted parties" now have an interest in ICANN policy
decisions that can raise ethical questions.
When I wrote the piece I was aware that NTIA was looking at baking ethics
provisions into the IANA contract renewal. Since then the EC papers have become
available, which also propose stringent (and somewhat misguided) ethics rules.
I welcome BC member feedback on the article and the overall issue. Thanks in
advance.
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|