<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] ALERTS from the Secretariat: Public Comment: Geographic Regions Review - Final Draft Report
- To: Bc-Gnso <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] ALERTS from the Secretariat: Public Comment: Geographic Regions Review - Final Draft Report
- From: Benedetta Rossi <secretariat-bc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:37:26 +0200
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-30sep11-en.htm
Geographic Regions Review – Draft Final ReportComment Period Deadlines
(*)Important Information LinksPublic Comment BoxOpen Date:30 September 2011To
Submit Your Comments (Forum)Close Date:19 December 2011Time (UTC):23:59View
Comments SubmittedSection I: Description, Explanation, and PurposeGeographic
diversity is a fundamental component of the ICANN organization. The ICANN
Bylaws (Article VI Section 5) currently define five geographic regions as
Africa, North America, Latin America/Caribbean, Asia/Australia/Pacific and
Europe.The ICANN Geographic Regions were originally created to ensure regional
diversity in the composition of the ICANN Board and were subsequently expanded
in various ways to apply to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO),
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and the Country Code Names Supporting
Organization (ccNSO).For the past two years a community-wide working group
chartered by the ICANN Board has been working to (1) confirm the history,
underlying principles and goals of the current geographic regions framework,
(2) analyze how those goals and principles have been applied by the Board,
Staff and community and (3) consulted with the community on how those
principles and goals can be best maintained in the future.This Draft Final
Report reflects the penultimate step of that research and consultation effort.
The draft document outlines specific recommendations from the Working Group to
the ICANN Board regarding how the present Geographic Regions Framework can be
modified to ensure that the organizational principles of geographic and
cultural diversity are honored and maintained. Those recommendations are based
on thorough research, extensive community consultation and reflect the points
of view of a wide range of the ICANN community.Mindful of the potential
implications even small changes to the framework could have on the wider
community, the WG decided to make this draft document available to the
community for review and comment before the WG formally publishes its Final
Report. The WG will closely review all submitted comments to determine if
further modifications to the draft document are necessary.Section II:
BackgroundThe ccNSO Council approved a resolution in 2007 recommending that the
ICANN Board appoint a community-wide working group to further study and review
the issues related to the definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions, to
consult with all stakeholders and submit proposals to the Board to resolve the
issues relating to the current definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions.The
rest of the community supported the concept of the working group and the Board
authorized its formation at its December 2008 Meeting (see -
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-07nov08.htm#_Toc87682556).The Board
approved the charter of the working group at its public meeting in June 2009
(see -http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun09.htm#1.2). Copies of
the Charter, in all six UN languages, are set forth here:
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/geographic-regions/charter-26jun09-en.htm.The
Working Group produced two previous reports. An Initial Report in which the
Working Group (1) identified the various applications and functions to which
“ICANN Geographic Regions” are currently applied by existing ICANN structures;
(2) documented other regionally identified processes and structures used within
ICANN but not defined in the Bylaws; and (3) detailed the “issues” that it
thought should be covered during its subsequent investigations.The Working
Group also produced an Interim Report that focused on general principles,
specific considerations and some of the critical issues that it intended to
address in its Final Report document. It (1) offered a review of the underlying
history, objectives and general principles of ICANN’s Geographic Regions
Framework; (2) raised a number of fundamental strategic questions for further
community consideration; and (c) expanded on a number of specific issues
identified in the Initial Report that were likely to be addressed in the Final
Report.Section III: Document and Resource LinksDocuments posted for
comment:Copies of the Draft Final Report in all six UN languages can be found
at the following links:العربية [PDF, 325 KB]中文 [PDF, 358 KB]English [PDF, 252
KB]Français [PDF, 324 KB]Русский [PDF, 388 KB]Español [PDF, 390 KB]Appendix A
(EN) [PDF, 112 KB]Appendix B (EN) [PDF, 81 KB]Additional Resources:Further
information on the work of the Geographic Regions Review Working Group is
available
at:https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Home+Page+of+Geographic+Regions+Review+Working+GroupSection
IV: Additional InformationThe entire structure of this Working Group effort
has been organized to achieve broad community input. All the individual ICANN
SOs and ACs were given the opportunity to comment on the community-wide working
group concept and each community was invited to send participants to be
involved with the working group (all but the RSSAC have contributed members).
The entire community had the opportunity to comment on the proposed charter of
the Working Group before it was approved by the Board (see March 2009
Geographic Region Review WG Charter Public Comment Period).Every written report
generated by the Working Group has been published in all six UN languages and
each has been subjected to extended community review and comment opportunities.
Working Group members individually reported on the group’s progress to their
respective communities. The Working Group also sponsored a community survey (in
the six UN languages and Portuguese) seeking another form of community input on
the geographic regions framework. Additionally, a public session was conducted
at the ICANN Public Meeting in Brussels (June 2010) and public workshops were
conducted at the Cartagena (December 2010), San Francisco (March 2011) and
Singapore (June 2011) Public Meetings to gather further community perspectives
on this matter.Staff Contact:Robert HoggarthEmail:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx
Kind Regards,
Benedetta Rossi
BC Secretariatwww.bizconst.orgsecretariat-bc@xxxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|