<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] for expedited review: draft BC comment on registry proposal for Continuity Operations Instrument (COI)
- To: "'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] for expedited review: draft BC comment on registry proposal for Continuity Operations Instrument (COI)
- From: <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:08:25 -0800
I support Jon's draft, thanks for the good work.
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:06 PM
To: 'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'
Subject: [bc-gnso] for expedited review: draft BC comment on registry
proposal for Continuity Operations Instrument (COI)
Per discussion in Dakar and on our 10-Nov member call, here is a draft of BC
comments on the a proposed alternative to the for Continuity Operations
Instrument in the new gTLD Program.
Jon Nevett prepared this draft.
This comment period and docs are described here
<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/rysg-proposal-cof-17oct11-en.htm> .
These comments are due 2-Dec, giving us 10 days for review and approval.
This is less than the 14-day period required in our charter, so I am
requesting an expedited review period. If any member has substantive
objections to the expedited review, we can go to 14 days and submit our
comments after the ICANN due date.
All BC members are invited to suggest edits. Please use track changes
and circulate to BC list.
Thanks again to Jon for taking the lead on this.
Steve DelBianco
vice chair for policy coordination, BC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|