RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN hearings

["Deutsch, Sarah B" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well said!  I'd also like to see copies of any testimony that is available.  It 
will be interesting to see what transpires at tomorrow's hearing.

Sarah



Sarah B. Deutsch 
Vice President & Associate General Counsel 
Verizon Communications 
Phone: 703-351-3044 
Fax: 703-351-3670 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Mike Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:38 PM
To: bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN hearings


Reading over today's testimony, one can't help but have the feeling that ICANN 
is digging itself deeper and deeper into a bunker position from which it may 
not recover.

I'm reminded of the gigantic underground cistern located near the Blue Mosque 
in Istanbul.   Worth a trip if you haven't seen it.

After the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Goths and so on came down the 
peninsula and ravaged the city.  So walls were built.   Then sieges were put in 
place and folks ran out of water.  So at great expense the cistern was dug and 
covered over.   Then longer sieges, etc.  The invaders prevailed.

The moral being that some ideas are so flawed that no amount of building walls 
thicker and cisterns deeper will carry the day.

The Kurt Pritz testimony goes on for more than 15 pages trying to cover every 
possible contingency of bad behavior connected to new TLDs.   And doesn't 
succeed.

Even though the BC membership includes members with multiple relationships to 
ICANN, some of which are linked to proposed new TLDs, the core rationale for 
our constituency is to represent business users of the Domain Name System.   
Setting aside IDNs, which have their own rationale, I haven't seen any 
enthusiasm for new TLDs among users, and most of us have been opposed but 
willing to work on the details with ICANN because that seemed better than 
letting it happen without any input from us.   What we have gotten for our 
trouble is Kurt claiming in his testimony that there is broad community support 
for new TLDs.  That has never been the case.

The ever greater accretion of protective bureaucracy to the program has 
produced a balance of costs and benefits - in the broad sense, including more 
than dollars and cents - that is seriously out of whack.   It's time for us to 
acknowledge this, and say so publicly.

- Mike