<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] FW: On Another DC Subject...
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: On Another DC Subject...
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 01:01:52 +0000
For those of you following the PIPA and SOPA anti-piracy bills pending in
Congress, I have posted a letter sent today to the Chairman and other senior
members of the House Judiciary Committee regarding the potential impact of SOPA
on registrars and other domain name intermediaries -
http://internetcommerce.org/SOPA%20Concerns
SOPA Could Shutter Registrars and other Domain Name Industry Intermediaries -
And Terminate Their Vital Registrant Services
The Internet Commerce Association has just sent a letter to senior members of
the House Judiciary Committee regarding the likely unintended but potentially
devastating impact of H.R. 3261 ("SOPA") as introduced upon ICANN-accredited
registrars and other participants in the broad domain name industry, as well as
upon the domain registrants who use those services. Registrants, for example,
might find it impossible to renew domains due to the extrajudicial termination
of payments services sanctioned by the proposal, or to complete domain sales or
transfers. Further, many of the domain name industry companies subject to
potential payment and advertising service termination under the bill might lack
the income to pursue their legal rights, and could well be forced into
bankruptcy.
This potential impact arises because, while domain names are subject to
trademark law, the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) as well
as ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) place the
responsibility for domain name infringement upon the domain registrant and look
at a variety of factors, particularly the actual use of the associated domain,
before reaching a determination as to whether infringement exists.
ICA believes that SOPA, as introduced, creates the strong possibility that
trademark rights holders will seek to have payment and ad services terminated
to registrars and other domain name intermediaries based upon the allegation
that they are facilitating the use of domains that constitute "counterfeit
marks" in and of themselves, without reference to actual use or available
defenses. This potential shifting of "cybersquatting" responsibility from
registrants to registrars and other domain name intermediaries, as well as the
failure to incorporate the more comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the ACPA
and UDRP, appears unjustified and unwise - and could lead to the shutdown of
these domain name intermediaries and the associated termination of critical
domain-related services to millions of registrants engaged in non-infringing
uses of their websites.
The letter also expresses concerns that the introduced legislation needs
substantial narrowing and is not required to effectively address infringement
on websites subject to U.S. court jurisdiction, and will also have negative
effects on cybersecurity and on the availability of venture capital for
innovative Internet startups.
At this time the full House Judiciary Committee is tentatively scheduled to
"markup" - amend and vote on reporting the bill to the full House of
Representatives - on Thursday, December 15th. U.S.-based domain industry
participants who have concerns about any aspect of the legislation should
contact their representatives at once, especially if they serve on the
Committee. A complete list of Committee members is available at
http://judiciary.house.gov/about/members.html .
The full text of ICA's letter follows --- (continue to the website if you wish
to read the full letter -- http://internetcommerce.org/SOPA%20Concerns )
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|