RE: [bc-gnso] Clarification

["Baskin, James F \(Jim\)" <james.f.baskin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

How about "provide direct access to" ?

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Michael D. Palage
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 2:01 PM
To: ''Bc GNSO list ''
Subject: [bc-gnso] Clarification

Hello All,
I am a little confused by the wording "[w]e believe that requiring all 
Registries to comply with Thick Whois."  How does one "comply" with thick 
whois?  Registries such as .NAME, .TEL and now .CAT "operate" their registry by 
collecting Thick whois data, but comply with national privacy laws in how they 
provide access to that data set. Having worked with a large number of new gTLD 
applicants with a variety of business models, I think the BC needs to be a 
little more careful in how we word our statements so they scale in a future 
world of thousands of new gTLDs.
Therefore, I would recommend that we change the phrase "comply with" to "have 
direct access to."
Best regards,
Michael