ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] BC Members Comments at the mike in the Public Forum in Prague - WHOIS and dotCom renewal

  • To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] BC Members Comments at the mike in the Public Forum in Prague - WHOIS and dotCom renewal
  • From: "Chris Chaplow" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:21:19 +0200

BC Members Comments at the mike in the Public Forum in Prague    28th June
2012.

Dot com renewal  &  Thick and Thin Whois

 

>>STEVE DelBIANCO: STEVE DELBIANCO FOR THE BUSINESS CONSTITUENCY. THE
BUSINESS CONSTITUENCY WAS DISAPPOINTED THAT THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PROCESS
DIDN'T RESULT IN A THICK WHOIS. WE'RE ALSO A BIT DISAPPOINTED AT THE QUALITY
OF THE RATIONALE AND EXPLANATION FOR NOT ADDRESSING THAT. AND I REALIZE THAT
WE MIGHT STILL GET A GREATER RATIONALE LATER ON. NONETHELESS, THE BC IS
COMMITTED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS SUCH THAT THICK
WHOIS BECOMES A CONSENSUS POLICY WITHIN THE PICKET FENCE. AND WE TAKE SOME
SOLACE IN KNOWING THAT DOING IT THAT WAY, WHILE IT MAY TAKE A LITTLE LONGER,
WILL HAVE A FAR BROADER REACH. BECAUSE ONCE WE GET IT IN AS A CONSENSUS
POLICY, IT WILL APPLY NOT ONLY TO THE DOT COM BUT ALSO TO THE ONLY OTHER
THIN REGISTRY DOT NET WHICH CAPTURES ANOTHER CHUNK OF USERS. SO IT WILL TAKE
A LITTLE LONGER, PROBABLY ANOTHER YEAR. BUT I AM DETERMINED THAT WE COVER
THICK WHOIS FOR EVERYONE AND IN THIS PROCESS SHOULD GET IT DONE SOONER. 

 

PHILIP CORWIN REPRESENTING DEVELOPERS AT BOTH THE TOP AND SECOND LEX. I JUST
WANTED TO THANK THE BOARD FOR REJECTING THE SECTIONS OF SOME PARTIES WHO
COMMENTED ON THE DOT COM RENEWAL THAT A MANDATE TO IMPLEMENT UNIFORM RAPID
SUSPENSION AT SOME POINT IN THE CONTRACT TERM BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT.
SOME PARTIES SUGGESTED THAT WERE THE VERY SAME PARTIES THAT URGED REFERRAL
OF UDRP REFORM SO THAT THE EXPERIENCE WITH URS COULD BE CONSIDERED AND THE
QUESTION ADDRESSED OF WHETHER IT SHOULD BE IMPOSED ON INCUMBENT REGISTRIES
AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE TURNING TO THE PRICING PROVISIONS I WOULD NOTE
THAT ICA WAS BORN OUT OF THE DEBATE OVER THOSE PROVISIONS SIX YEARS AGO.
THERE'S NO NEED TO REVISIT THAT DEBATE. BUT WE DO HOPE THE NEW gTLD PROCESS
WILL INTERVIEWS VIGOROUS PRICE COMPETITION INTO THE gTLD MARKETPLACE, WHICH
WILL BENEFIT ALL DOMAIN REGISTRANTS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>>STEVE CROCKER: THANK YOU. 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy