[bc-gnso] RE: [Bc-private] BC Calls -- A proposal for a new format

[<icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am in complete agreement with David's logical proposal.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087

 <http://rodenbaugh.com> http://rodenbaugh.com 

 

From: bc-private-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:bc-private-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Fares, David
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 7:38 AM
To: bc-private icann.org (bc-private@xxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [Bc-private] BC Calls -- A proposal for a new format

 

Colleagues,

 

I would like to make several proposal a new structure for future BC calls to
ensure that they are an opportunity for meaningful exchange among members
and not simply reports to members.  To achieve this I recommend that:

 

1.      Substantive issues that require discussion and procedural matters
that require decision are handled first;
2.      Items for reporting are last and should, whenever possible be
summarized in writing in advance of the call so people can digest them and
offer input/ask questions; and
3.      Time limits should be set for each item to ensure that we get
through the agenda within the allotted time.

 

Our goal is to make the calls an efficient, effective and substantive forum
for discussions.

 

I would welcome thoughts from other members.

 

Thanks,

David

 

David Fares

Senior Vice President, Government Relations

News Corporation

Tel:

   London: +44-20-7753-7294

   NY: +1-212-556-2464

 


This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or
confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this
message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete
this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply
e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not relate
to the official business of News America Incorporated or its subsidiaries
must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No
representation is made that this email or its attachments are without
defect.