RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.

["HASSAN Ayesha" <ayesha.hassan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have been contacted by some of my members (ICC) that are also BC members 
regarding this matter.   I recognize that this is a very important procedural 
matter that could have a profound impact on the BC's representation within the 
GNSO, Board and other positions' selection processes. I feel that without a 
more formal decision from my broader membership (ICC membership) I cannot weigh 
in formally on this matter.  With this in mind, I feel that I should recuse 
myself from offering any personal thoughts on this matter also given that my 
partner is on the ICANN Board and I would like to avoid any appearance of 
conflict for myself and to avoid any possible negative implications for the BC 
itself.

Kind regards,
Ayesha


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Deutsch, Sarah B
Sent: mercredi 3 octobre 2012 18:45
To: 'DFares@xxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 
'phil.lodico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 
'bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx'; 'marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx'; 'Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.


I strongly agree with David's proposal.

Sarah


Sarah B. Deutsch
Vice President & Associate General Counsel Verizon Communications
Phone: 703-351-3044
Fax:       703-351-3670
sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: Fares, David [mailto:DFares@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:27 AM
To: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Phil Lodico' 
<phil.lodico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Frederick Felman' 
<Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'bc - GNSO list' <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>; 
'Marilyn Cade' <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Elisa Cooper' 
<Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.


Colleagues,

I would like to reiterate the proposal that I made on the BC call yesterday 
regarding the procedure for selecting our NomComm representatives.  First 
however, I would like to make clear that NewsCorp is in no way questioning the 
integrity and competence of the candidates for the NomComm, all three would be 
excellent representatives.

While the Bylaws appear to delegate to the Excomm a decision as to whether 
NomComm representatives should be appointed by the Excomm or elected by the 
constituency members, I would recommend that the BC, by default, adopt 
elections to ensure transparency and that all members' voices are heard.  I 
would also recommend that we amend the Bylaws to require elections for BC 
Nomcomm representatives.

Thanks,
David

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 6:22 PM
To: 'Phil Lodico'; 'Frederick Felman'; 'bc - GNSO list'; 'Marilyn Cade'; 'Elisa 
Cooper'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.


Agree.  Would like to know who was the third nominee and why ExComm took it 
upon itself to make this decision without input from Members.

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Phil Lodico
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:43 PM
To: Frederick Felman; 'bc - GNSO list'; Marilyn Cade; Elisa Cooper
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
Importance: High


I echo Fred's comments on this topic.

On 10/2/12 12:00 PM, "Frederick Felman" <Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>Marilyn -
>
>Apparently, I could not be heard when there was a call for other 
>business.  I won't be able to remain on the entire call as I have 
>another meeting. Would you please ask if there are others that feel 
>there should be a general vote on Nomination Committee representation 
>as we
do?
>
>I'm sorry if we did not object before the excomm acted, I missed that 
>it was going to be decided by the excomm only.
>
>We are uncomfortable with the composition of BC representation on the 
>NomComm. We would like to see a large business representative in the 
>mix and want to see if others feel the same way.
>
>Thank you  - Fred
>
>From: Chris Chaplow <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 7:54 AM
>To: 'bc - GNSO list' <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>>
>Subject: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
>
>Dear Members,
>Please find attached an anotated agenda for the Totronto meeting that 
>Bene prepared for us.  It will refered to on the upcoming BC members 
>call  in 45 mins time at 11.30 EST.
>The link to the schedule on the ICANN website is found here :
>http://toronto45.icann.org/full-schedule
>
>best
>
>Chris Chaplow
>Managing Director
>Andalucia.com S.L.
>Avenida del Carmen 9
>Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
>1ª Planta, Oficina 30
>Estepona, 29680
>Malaga, Spain
>Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
>Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
>E-mail: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Web: www.andalucia.com<http://www.andalucia.com/>
>Information about Andalucia, Spain.
>





This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential 
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the 
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message 
to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments 
to anyone.
Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its 
attachments that does not relate to the official business of News America 
Incorporated or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or 
endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email or its 
attachments are without defect.