RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.

[Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill,

I believe that we agreed to modify the Charter to mandate a vote on future 
NomComm appointees.

Not sure what the next steps are though? 

Best,
Elisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Bill [mailto:bill.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 6:20 PM
To: Deutsch, Sarah B
Cc: DFares@xxxxxxxxxxxx; mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
phil.lodico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Frederick Felman; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx; 
marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; Elisa Cooper
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.

Likewise.

What is the status of this issue? I have been more than a little busy with the 
ITU and other non-ICANN Internet Governance issues and haven't been able to 
keep up on all mail lists.

On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:45 AM, "Deutsch, Sarah B" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> 
> I strongly agree with David's proposal.
> 
> Sarah
> 
> 
> Sarah B. Deutsch
> Vice President & Associate General Counsel Verizon Communications
> Phone: 703-351-3044
> Fax:       703-351-3670
> sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fares, David [mailto:DFares@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:27 AM
> To: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Phil Lodico' 
> <phil.lodico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Frederick Felman' 
> <Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'bc - GNSO list' 
> <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Marilyn Cade' <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Elisa 
> Cooper' <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
> 
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> I would like to reiterate the proposal that I made on the BC call yesterday 
> regarding the procedure for selecting our NomComm representatives.  First 
> however, I would like to make clear that NewsCorp is in no way questioning 
> the integrity and competence of the candidates for the NomComm, all three 
> would be excellent representatives.
> 
> While the Bylaws appear to delegate to the Excomm a decision as to whether 
> NomComm representatives should be appointed by the Excomm or elected by the 
> constituency members, I would recommend that the BC, by default, adopt 
> elections to ensure transparency and that all members' voices are heard.  I 
> would also recommend that we amend the Bylaws to require elections for BC 
> Nomcomm representatives.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 6:22 PM
> To: 'Phil Lodico'; 'Frederick Felman'; 'bc - GNSO list'; 'Marilyn Cade'; 
> 'Elisa Cooper'
> Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
> 
> 
> Agree.  Would like to know who was the third nominee and why ExComm took it 
> upon itself to make this decision without input from Members.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Phil Lodico
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:43 PM
> To: Frederick Felman; 'bc - GNSO list'; Marilyn Cade; Elisa Cooper
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> I echo Fred's comments on this topic.
> 
> On 10/2/12 12:00 PM, "Frederick Felman" 
> <Frederick.Felman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Marilyn -
>> 
>> Apparently, I could not be heard when there was a call for other 
>> business.  I won't be able to remain on the entire call as I have 
>> another meeting. Would you please ask if there are others that feel 
>> there should be a general vote on Nomination Committee representation 
>> as we
> do?
>> 
>> I'm sorry if we did not object before the excomm acted, I missed that 
>> it was going to be decided by the excomm only.
>> 
>> We are uncomfortable with the composition of BC representation on the 
>> NomComm. We would like to see a large business representative in the 
>> mix and want to see if others feel the same way.
>> 
>> Thank you  - Fred
>> 
>> From: Chris Chaplow <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2012 7:54 AM
>> To: 'bc - GNSO list' <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>>
>> Subject: [bc-gnso] Toronto Agenda for BC members call.
>> 
>> Dear Members,
>> Please find attached an anotated agenda for the Totronto meeting that 
>> Bene prepared for us.  It will refered to on the upcoming BC members 
>> call  in 45 mins time at 11.30 EST.
>> The link to the schedule on the ICANN website is found here :
>> http://toronto45.icann.org/full-schedule
>> 
>> best
>> 
>> Chris Chaplow
>> Managing Director
>> Andalucia.com S.L.
>> Avenida del Carmen 9
>> Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
>> 1ª Planta, Oficina 30
>> Estepona, 29680
>> Malaga, Spain
>> Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
>> Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
>> E-mail: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Web: www.andalucia.com<http://www.andalucia.com/>
>> Information about Andalucia, Spain.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or 
> confidential information. It is intended solely for the named 
> addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or 
> responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not 
> copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone.
> Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments 
> and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this 
> message and its attachments that does not relate to the official 
> business of News America Incorporated or its subsidiaries must be 
> taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No 
> representation is made that this email or its attachments are without 
> defect.
> 
> 
> 
>