<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] Summary report from GNSO Council meeting in Toronto
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] Summary report from GNSO Council meeting in Toronto
- From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:36:22 +0000
GNSO Council met on 17-Oct-2012. (see
Agenda<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/agenda+17+October+2012>
and
motions<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+October+2012>
as posted)
Here is a quick report on what happened today:
Nominations sought for second ATRT review team. Olaf said the second review is
de-novo, so don’t pre-judge this review based on prior reviews.
Motion on advice letter for Consumer Trust Metrics: John Berard withdrew
motion, explaining WG plan to address open/closed TLDs and issue new advice.
Jeff commented. Wolfgang says he has issues with def of consumer trust.
Motion for a PDP on Uniformity of Ry/Rr Contracts w/r/t abuse. There was no
second for this motion. Holding Zahid’s proxy, John withdrew the motion.
Jeff Neuman opened discussion, criticizing the motion. Said the WG voted 8-6
on this item and said that all 8 votes for the motion were from BC members.
Registrars also oppose PDP. Staff commented that they shouldn’t be tasked with
reports that have little support.
Afterwards, Mikey O’Connor suggested we “mine” the WG report for several types
of abuse that should be addressed in ICANN compliance, RAA negotiations, etc.
BC motion to request issues report on uniformity of reporting. Passed
unanimously.
Motion on Thick WHOIS PDP: Milton wanted to amend the charter to specifically
call-out privacy rights. Jeff Neuman disagreed with Milton and said we should
not expand the scope of this PDP. Jeff read the present PDP charter language:
Impact on privacy and data protection: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect privacy
and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different
jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy
as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
Mikey O’Connor went to mic and offered to help with draft language from Avri,
specifically calling for consideration of “internationally agreed rights”.
Neuman did not accept this as friendly, and the amendment failed.
On the main motion, Wendy said she supported but agrees with SSAC that no
further whois work should proceed until the purpose of whois is determined.
The main motion passed unanimously. Nobody volunteered to be Council Liaison…
Motion to Adopt IRTP Part C Final Report and Recommendations: Stephane
accepted Mary’s amendment. Motion passed unanimously.
Motion to initiate issues report on Internationalized Registration Data.
Passed unanimously.
--
Lyman Chapin (ICANN Staff) gave report on feasibility to do a study on WHOIS
proxy/privacy relay and reveal requests. Conclusions: full study is feasible;
would not answer all questions; all players felt study would be useful;
privacy/proxy requesters were eager to participate; privacy/proxy services saw
opportunity to show good industry actors.
--
New Councilors were seated. Council Chair elections: Jonathan Robinson got
only 3 of the 13 votes in non-contract house, but advanced to second round
voting vs “None of the Above”. Jonathan Robinson won unanimously in CPH and
lost only 2 votes in NCPH, and is new chair of Council.
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|