[bc-gnso] Score 4 points for the BC

[Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ICANN posted a revised new gTLD Registry agreement 
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm>)
 and comment periods yesterday.

Buried in there are 4 points the BC has pressed for the past year:

Our first point:  there's a new Public Interest Commitments page (Specification 
11) in the new Ry agreement.  It requires use of only registrars using the 
latest RAA (Registrar Accreditation Agreement).  This was #6 on our Toronto 
list 
(link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/Consensus%20Improvements%20to%20RPMs%20for%20new%20gTLDs.pdf>)
 and #4 in our Jan-2012 letter 
(link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20request%20for%20implementation%20improvements.pdf>).

Second point:  Specification 11 also says that all commitments and statements 
of intent from the new gTLD application are incorporated by reference in the Ry 
agreement.  And they will be enforceable by ICANN.  This was #7 on our Toronto 
list 
(link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/Consensus%20Improvements%20to%20RPMs%20for%20new%20gTLDs.pdf>)
 and #1 in our Jan-2012 letter 
(link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20request%20for%20implementation%20improvements.pdf>).

Score another point for our quest to let dot-brand TLDs skip having to use all 
registrars.  We first pressed for this in 2010 
(link<http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20on%20Final%20App%20Guidebook.pdf>)
  There was already an exemption request available, but now it's in the base 
agreement:
2.9(a)  All domain name registrations in the TLD must be registered through an 
ICANN accredited registrar; provided, that Registry Operator need not use a 
registrar if it registers names in its own name in order to withhold such names 
from delegation or use in accordance with Section 2.6.

Finally, we'll take a point for stimulating a public comment period on closed 
generic gTLDs.  
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-en.htm>)
   The BC doesn't have a position for/against closed generics, but we have been 
pressing ICANN to clarify how a registry can qualify for a Code of Conduct 
exception to allow ownership of all domain names and bypass use of all 
registrars.

More to come as we craft our BC comments on these changes.

Meanwhile, congratulations on 4 hard-won points for the BC team.


--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482