ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] DRAFT FOR REVIEW: BC comment on closed generic TLDs

  • To: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] DRAFT FOR REVIEW: BC comment on closed generic TLDs
  • From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:05:37 +0000

Attached is a draft comment from the BC regarding ICANN's call for comments on 
"closed generic" TLDs 
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/closed-generic-05feb13-en.htm>).
   This comment period closes 7-Mar.

Because there was not significant support for any of the straw poll options, 
the BC is not submitting a recommendation on closed generics.  Instead, the 
attached comment documents prior BC positions and summarizes our recent 
discussion of this topic.

I will collect any final comments on this "non-comment" draft until midnight 
5-Mar and then submit to ICANN on 7-Mar.  In my view, there is no requirement 
for formal position voting since the BC is not taking a position on the 
question at issue.

Some background:
This issue was discussed on BC member call 12-Feb.

A straw poll was circulated to members on 17-Feb.

Summary of comments received after the straw poll:

Elisa Cooper (Mark Monitor) recused because of clients on both sides of the 
issue.

Phil Corwin (ICA) reported its members desired no position.

Barbara Wanner (USCIB) reported its members have no consensus.

Andy Abrams (Google) said it was inappropriate to create a class of "closed 
generics" when the proposed models vary so widely.  Google also said it would 
be unfair to applicants if ICANN significantly changed the Guidebook rules at 
this time.

Ron Andruff and Mike Rodenbaugh differed on their recollection of how 
specifically this closed generic topic was covered in the vertical integration 
working group in 2009.

Mike Roberts pointed out the distinction between prospective and retrospective 
remedies for anti-competitive behavior.

Phil Corwin and Andy Abrams (Google) said that governments and regulators would 
enforce competition laws post-delegation, whether or not ICANN granted a TLD an 
exemption to the registry Code of Conduct.

Sarah Deutsch (Verizon) supported prospective resolution on this issue, and 
indicated support for dot-brands as closed TLDs.

--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482

Attachment: BC Comment on Closed Generic TLDs.docx
Description: BC Comment on Closed Generic TLDs.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy