<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Outline for discussion of RAA comments today
- To: "'gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx'" <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>, Steve Delbianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>, bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Outline for discussion of RAA comments today
- From: "Hansen, Anjali" <AHansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 15:21:56 +0000
That's okay Gabi, we'll circulate comments after this call and you can still
provide feedback.
Anjali Karina Hansen Deputy General Counsel
Tel: 703-247-9340
Fax: 703-276-0634
Email: ahansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ahansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
bbb.org<http://www.bbb.org/> Start With Trust(r)
Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc.
3033 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600
Arlington, VA 22201
For consumer tips, scams and alerts: Read our blog
<http://www.bbb.org/blog/>Find us on: Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/bbb_us> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Better-Business-Bureau-US/25368131403> |
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1917928&trk=anet_ug_grppro>
| YouTube<http://www.youtube.com/user/BBBconsumerTips> |
Flickr<http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbb_us>
This message is a private communication, and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake, please
notify the sender by reply email and then delete the message from your system
without printing, copying or forwarding it. Thank you.
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:46 AM
To: Steve Delbianco; owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx; bc - GNSO list
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Outline for discussion of RAA comments today
Dear all,
Steve: thanks so much as always for the excellent work and the useful and
organized information you send to facilitate our analysis and interchange of
ideas.
My apologies to all: I will have to follow this issue through the transcripts
as something urgent has just came up and I cannot participate today.
Regards,
G.
Gabriela Szlak
eInstituto
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
________________________________
From: Steve DelBianco
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sender: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 14:26:16 +0000
To: 'bc - GNSO list'<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [bc-gnso] Outline for discussion of RAA comments today
Here's an outline for today's member discussion of BC comments on the RAA.
(11am eastern US time)
Public Comment page is
here<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-22apr13-en.htm>.
The proposed final RAA is
here<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-agreement-22apr13-en.pdf%20>.
Initial comments due 13-May
Outline:
1. Privacy/Proxy Specification
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrant-rights-responsibilities-22apr13-en.pdf>)
There is no Service level specified for timing and methods to relay
communications and reveal data to complainant.
2. Whois
Maintain bulk access to Whois (port 43)
"Willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable whois information" as basis to
suspend a registration (3.7.7.2)
If Registrant data isn't validated in 15 days, should registrations be
suspended during manual validation?
Should same accuracy requirement apply to Account Holder data as well?
3. Enforcement of Registrant Rights
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrant-rights-responsibilities-22apr13-en.pdf>),
in particular:
"You shall not be subject to false advertising or deceptive practices by your
Registrar or though any proxy or privacy services made available by your
Registrar. This includes deceptive notices, hidden fees, and any practices that
are illegal under the consumer protection law of your residence."
Do we need additional clarity in order to enforce Registrar obligations?
Proposed RAA says:
RAA 3.7.10 Registrar shall publish on its website(s) and/or provide a link
to the Registrants' Rights and Responsibilities Specification attached hereto
and shall not take any action inconsistent with the corresponding provisions of
this Agreement or applicable law.
Note: during the Beijing meeting, ICANN attorney Samantha Eisner told the BC
that Public comment would be particularly valuable in these areas:
Registrant rights & responsibilities. This was drafted by registrars.
Validation of registrant data (registrant and account holder?)
Penalties for inaccurate data
Registrars want to drop Port 43 access for thick registries
Unilateral amendment by ICANN.
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|