<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs
- To: "icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lhc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lhc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "svg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <svg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs
- From: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Oh, and as to a counter-argument to your position, I refer you to the USPTO's
disposition of the various .music trademark applications. While not identical,
the USPTO's reasoning is very solar to the concerns I have heard from
others.<br/><br/>J. Scott <br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|