RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN Staff Report on Public Comments re: GAC Safeguard Advice

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

As I am monitoring the ITU Council's discussions about issues which impact 
Internatioinal Internet public policy [translate: more governments governing 
IP/domain names/AS #s] to replace 'one' government and "the dominant companies 
from that country", I hope that the BC is following closely and understanding 
that support to ICANN means that all voices are heard.
I support the importance of the GAC advice, and also the SSAC reports which 
indicate that there are strong risks and threats that are not yet addressed by 
ICANN in some of the proposed gTLDs.
In particular, I think that the BC/CSG should prioritize meeting with the SSAC 
on its various reports of relevance, even if that means that we organize 
extra-ordinary sessions, at lunch or on the Sat or Sunday. 
The BC is clear in our mission that SSR is a primary concern. We are not 
representing applicants. We are striving to ensure a stable, secure, 
predictable, and resiliant Internet that supports an online world of both 
commerce and social engagement and interactions.  
While some members 'might' be applicants, they checked the box in their 
application that they will not in any way advance that perspective in the BC. 
Respecting that, the BC needs to advance the concerns of user entities, both in 
the new gTLD program, and in all aspects of our work at ICANN. 
Marilyn Cade
From: psc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN Staff Report on Public Comments re: GAC Safeguard 
Advice
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:23:54 +0000









http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13/msg00134.html

 
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
 
Twitter: @VlawDC
 
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey