<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] RE: ICANN Staff Report on Public Comments re: GAC Safeguard Advice
- To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: ICANN Staff Report on Public Comments re: GAC Safeguard Advice
- From: "Deutsch, Sarah B" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:47:34 -0400
Phil,
Thanks for sharing. The staff report delves straight into the weeds without
giving big picture data. It would be good to know how many commentators
generally supported the GAC vs. raised concerns and who were the parties doing
each?
Sarah
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Phil Corwin
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:24 PM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN Staff Report on Public Comments re: GAC Safeguard
Advice
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13/msg00134.html
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|