<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
- To: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
- From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:16:21 -0300
+1
Gabi
--
*Dra. Gabriela Szlak *
Abogada & Mediadora en Estudio ROSZ
Directora Regional en eInstituto
Consultora en Derecho y Nuevas Tecnologías
www.clared.co
www.estudiorosz.com.ar
www.einstituto.org <http://www.einstituto.com.ar/>
www.gabrielaszlak.com.ar <http://www.gabrielaszlak.com.ar/>
*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak
La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.
2013/7/10 Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Angie,****
>
> ** **
>
> Many, many thanks for this analysis.****
>
> ** **
>
> It is extremely helpful, and your support is appreciated immensely.****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
> Elisa****
>
> ****
>
> Elisa Cooper****
>
> Director of Product Marketing****
>
> MarkMonitor****
>
> ** **
>
> Elisa Cooper****
>
> Chair ****
>
> ICANN Business Constituency****
>
> ****
>
> 208 389-5779 PH****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve DelBianco
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:39 AM
> *To:* bc - GNSO list
> *Cc:* Angie Graves
> *Subject:* [bc-gnso] Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves****
>
> ** **
>
> Last week, BC member Angie Graves asked me if there were any policy
> coordination projects she could help with. I suggested 2 documents that
> would help BC members going into the Durban meeting. Angie came thru with
> the two attachments:****
>
> ** **
>
> 1. Analysis of the public comments on GAC Safeguard Advice. (first
> attachment) Here, Angie went thru all 130 of the public comments on
> GAC Safeguard advice, and categorized them (applicant, contract party,
> registrant, user). This should help us distinguish GAC support/opposition
> coming from "customers" of ICANN versus contract parties and TLD
> applicants. Angie welcomes further insights on correcting the
> categorizations.****
>
> ** **
>
> 2. Analysis of the BC's RAA requests, versus what the Board approved in
> the final 2013 RAA. (second attachment) As we anticipated, few of our
> requests were granted. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you, Angie, for your contributions to the BC's policy work.****
>
> --Steve****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> --****
>
> Steve DelBianco****
>
> Executive Director****
>
> NetChoice****
>
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org ****
>
> +1.202.420.7482 ****
>
> ** **
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|