<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] U.S. official: If the UN keeps trying to regulate the Web, we should consider pulling funding
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] U.S. official: If the UN keeps trying to regulate the Web, we should consider pulling funding
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:59:44 +0000
FYI--
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/09/12/u-s-official-if-the-un-keeps-trying-to-regulate-the-web-we-should-consider-pulling-funding/
U.S. official: If the UN keeps trying to regulate the Web, we should consider
pulling funding
By Brian Fung, Updated: September 12, 2013
The United States should consider withdrawing its funding from the
International Telecommunications Union if the UN agency keeps trying to assert
regulatory authority over the Internet, a U.S. official said Thursday.
Ajit Pai, a Republican member of the Federal Communications Commission, hinted
that the intergovernmental body's proposed
rules<http://www.zdnet.com/itu-chief-claims-dubai-meeting-success-despite-collapse-of-talks-7000008808/>
- which critics say gives governments more power to censor the Web - may have
put the group's future in jeopardy.
"If the organization decides to become an international regulatory authority
for the Internet," he said at a Washington conference for gay and lesbian
technology advocates, "we will have to ask ourselves whether the United States
should remain one of its top two funders."
The United States
contributes<http://defundtheitu.com/uploads/S11-CL-C-0041.pdf> nearly $11
million a year to the ITU, a figure that accounts for 7.7 percent of the
agency's budget. Japan is the only other country to donate as much.
Last year, the United States and dozens of other countries walked away from an
ITU plan that would have targeted spam and enhanced broadband access in
developing countries, largely over a separate
provision<http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/9/3747402/countries-propose-greater-itu-influence>
that would have allowed governments to manage their domestic Internets more
intensively. Free-speech advocates worried that the rule would have given
countries such as Russia and China greater freedom to suppress politically
sensitive content.
In response, one opposition organization launched a bid to defund the ITU. The
North American Network Operators' Group started a White House petition in
January, but failed to attract enough
co-signers<https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/de-fund-itu/mSJ49QcV> to
require a response from the Obama administration.
Pai is among the first U.S. officials to publicly sympathize with the idea. The
next meeting of the ITU isn't until next year in Busan, South Korea. But that
gives anti-ITU activists plenty of time to build support for the movement.
(c) The Washington Post Company
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|