ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] RE: LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)

  • To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx list" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)
  • From: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:34:20 +0000

Thank you Steve.

Best,
Elisa

Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor

Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency

208 389-5779 PH

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 6:33 PM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx list
Subject: [bc-gnso] LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline 
is 18-Sep)
Importance: High

This is "Last Call" regarding proposed BC comments on Rights Protection 
Mechanism (RPM) requirements (attached).  This public comment 
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm>)
 closes 18-Sep.

Here's the history on this comment draft:

We circulated Elisa Cooper's initial draft on 26-Aug and discussed on our 
member call on 29-Aug.

Andy Abrams (Google) quickly suggested "a minimum 60-day combined 
sunrise/notice period as opposed to a minimum 30-day notice period and minimum 
30-day sunrise period."

Liz (FairWinds), Laura (Yahoo), and Marie (AIM) agreed with Andy's suggestion.  
As did Elisa, who circulated a new draft on 3-Sep.

Members who would object to the attached comment should REPLY ALL by 17-Sep 
indicating concerns.   Unless more than 5 members object, I will file these 
comments on 18-Sep.

Thanks to Elisa and Andy for their work on this comment.

--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy