<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] RE: LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)
- To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx list" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline is 18-Sep)
- From: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:34:20 +0000
Thank you Steve.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 6:33 PM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx list
Subject: [bc-gnso] LAST CALL: BC comment on RPM Requirements (filing deadline
is 18-Sep)
Importance: High
This is "Last Call" regarding proposed BC comments on Rights Protection
Mechanism (RPM) requirements (attached). This public comment
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm>)
closes 18-Sep.
Here's the history on this comment draft:
We circulated Elisa Cooper's initial draft on 26-Aug and discussed on our
member call on 29-Aug.
Andy Abrams (Google) quickly suggested "a minimum 60-day combined
sunrise/notice period as opposed to a minimum 30-day notice period and minimum
30-day sunrise period."
Liz (FairWinds), Laura (Yahoo), and Marie (AIM) agreed with Andy's suggestion.
As did Elisa, who circulated a new draft on 3-Sep.
Members who would object to the attached comment should REPLY ALL by 17-Sep
indicating concerns. Unless more than 5 members object, I will file these
comments on 18-Sep.
Thanks to Elisa and Andy for their work on this comment.
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|