<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] {String similarity decision -- 5e2cea81-3212-45ed-b422-8e47a2b5364e}_50_504_T_00243_13_determination.pdf
- To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>, "psc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] {String similarity decision -- 5e2cea81-3212-45ed-b422-8e47a2b5364e}_50_504_T_00243_13_determination.pdf
- From: "Deutsch, Sarah B" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:53:29 -0400
This was one of the arguments offered by Donuts/Foggy Beach LLC and rejected by
the panelist (send in the lifeguard):
The Applicant argues that the addition of one letter to a short word such as
"game with that letter located on a
different row on a typewriter keyboard does not equal visual similarity. I do
not find this to be a persuasive
argument.
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of J.
Scott Evans
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 5:24 PM
To: psc@xxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] {String similarity decision --
5e2cea81-3212-45ed-b422-8e47a2b5364e}_50_504_T_00243_13_determination.pdf
That applicants are having to file objections on this type of issue shows how
the evaluation systems is broken. This decision is right on.
J. Scott
Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
________________________________
From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>;
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>>;
Subject: [bc-gnso] {String similarity decision --
5e2cea81-3212-45ed-b422-8e47a2b5364e}_50_504_T_00243_13_determination.pdf
Sent: Fri, Oct 4, 2013 9:14:24 PM
Google has prevailed in its string similarity objection against Donuts'
.games...
http://images.go.adr.org/Web/AmericanArbitrationAssociation/%7B5e2cea81-3212-45ed-b422-8e47a2b5364e%7D_50_504_T_00243_13_determination.pdf?utm_content=buffer63fb1&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Buffer
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|