ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [bc-gnso] Policy calendar for 6-Mar-2014 BC member call

  • To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Policy calendar for 6-Mar-2014 BC member call
  • From: Laura Covington <lhc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:11:00 +0000

Me too- sorry

Laura Covington

On Mar 5, 2014, at 6:32 PM, "John Berard" 
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


I have a conflict that prevents me from participating on tomorrow's call.


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Steve DelBianco 
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Here's a Policy Calendar for the BC member call on 6-Mar-2014.

Channel 1. BC participation in ICANN Public Comment process:
ICANN Public Comment page is <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment> 
here<https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment>.   Selected comment 
opportunities below:

Privacy/Proxy Accreditation:   We had no volunteers to handle questions from a 
PDP working group on Accreditation of Privacy & Proxy services under the new 
RAA.  Deadline was Friday, so I responded for the BC with previous positions 
and new questions (not positions).    See my response 
 and please volunteer for this WG and/or attend session in Singapore on an 
issue that’s vital to BC members.

1. Status update from expert working group on gTLD Directory Services  
(comments closed 28-Feb)
The EWG status update is 
 and described on this page 
   Jimson Olufuye , Tim Chen, and Susan Kawaguchi drafted and we submitted 
yesterday (attachment)

2. Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2) Final Report & 
   (reply comments close 15-Mar)
Steve DelBianco drafted BC comments and circulated for review on 17-Feb.    I 
am now sorting through 44 comments from BC members and will circuit a 
consolidated version for final review.   Thanks for your attention to this 

3. Qualified Launch Program for new gTLDs 
(reply comments close 15-Mar)
The new registry agreement allows operator to register 100 names for itself (or 
to third parties) for promoting their TLDs — prior to the Sunrise period.

4. Proposed Review Mechanism to Address Inconsistent Expert Determinations on 
String Confusion Objections    Comment page 
 (Initial comments due 12-Mar)
<BC Comments - Status Report from EWG on gTLD Directory Services - FINAL.pdf>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy