ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] RE: Draft Report on Choice, Competition and Consumer Trust

  • To: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Draft Report on Choice, Competition and Consumer Trust
  • From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 13:26:10 -0400

Dear all,


Following on from Stephane?s mail below regarding our call today, pursuant
to Steve? request, please find the IAG-CCT PDF version of the draft report
on choice, competition and consumer trust on the community wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/display/IAG/Draft+IAG-CCT+report.  The final
report will be delivered in time for the Los Angeles ICANN meeting, so this
is the community?s opportunity to provide your thoughts on the draft.


It should be noted that this work is intended to inform the New TLD Review
Working Group when it takes up their review of new gTLDs one year after they
have been added to the A root.


Kind regards,




Ron Andruff

ONR Consulting, Inc.

 <http://www.ICANNSherpa.com> www.ICANNSherpa.com  


From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stephane Van Gelder
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 12:24
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] Fwd: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working
Party teleconference Thursday 07 August 2014 1400 UTC




FYI, for those of you who want to listen to the call that Ron talked about
in the update he gave during our own constituency call today.




Stéphane Van Gelder

Milathan LTD

"Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice"

Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx> >
Date: 7 August 2014 17:33
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party
teleconference Thursday 07 August 2014 1400 UTC
To: "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> "
<gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx> >
Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx> " <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx> >


Dear All,

Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Review Working Party
teleconference held on Thursday 07 August 2014 at 1400 UTC at:

 On page: 


 The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO
Master Calendar page:




Klaus Stoll

Jennifer Wolfe

Philip Sheppard

Ron Andruff

Chuck Gomes

Stephane Van Gelder

Avri Doria

Rafik Dammak


Guest speaker: Colin Jackson, Richard Westlake


Apologies: none


ICANN Staff:

Larisa Gurnick

Mary Wong

Lars Hoffman

Matt Ashtiani

Glen de St Gery

Nathalie Peregrine


** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **


Thank you.
Kind regards,




Adobe Chat transcript:

  Matt Ashtiani:Welcome all to the GNSO Review Working Party Meeting on 7
August 2014!

  Philip:waiting on phone

  Ron A:Greetings all!

  Jennifer Wolfe:Hello to everyone!

  Philip:on phone line now  hello everyone

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):Hi

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the AC room

  Matt Ashtiani:survey monkey link -

  Matt Ashtiani:Date: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 Time: 19:00-19:30 UTC (time
converter: http://goo.gl/kJvuIm)

  Matt Ashtiani:Date: Wednesday, 13 August 2014 Time: 14:00-14:30 UTC (time
converter: http://goo.gl/UNDIsl)

  Matt Ashtiani:Additionaly webinar information -

  Nathalie  Peregrine:David Maher has joined the AC room

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):I assumed the 50 to 100 number was per major category
not for total responses.

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):I am okay with waiting until after the webinars but I
wouldn't wait much longer.

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):Poor participation in the webinars would provide a good
indicator of the problem of August.

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):I think it would be good to do the webinars again in
early September.

  rafik:@chuck I didnt see announcement circulated yet about the survey

  Jennifer Wolfe:Sorry - my phone line dropped - calling back in.

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):What about changing the deadline to September 23.  Then
we could add a week if needed and still end by September 30.

  Ron A:@Chuck: support Sept 23

  Jennifer Wolfe:Back on line.  

  Larisa Gurnick:@rafik - staff circulated the announcement to this group
yesterday via email and you can see the posted announcement here:

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):Please read the WG question that was included.

  Ron A:@ Jen: two in the queue since you dropped

  Ron A:As Chuck has requested: What is the Working Group  question that has
been included?

  Larisa Gurnick:@Avri - who would be the ideal audience for WG survey?

  Colin Jackson:Perhaps any WG survery could be targetted at WG members

  Ron A:All members of the GNSO are potential WG members.

  Avri Doria:Larisa, all who have been in a WG, and that is aa broad
audience that goes beyond gnso

  Avri Doria:Colin, exactly, past and present.  it is a big filed that goes
beyond those who are SG/C members.

  Larisa Gurnick:Thank you, Avri

  Ron A:Thank you for that.  checking back on their affiliation is

  Avri Doria:What about people who are members of one group and observers of

  Larisa Gurnick:There is a text box in the actual survey - this is a pdf

  Philip:Ignorance has never been a barrier to opinion  within ICANN

  Philip:; )

  Ron A:My concern is that bad actors might see this as an opportunity to
cast dispersions on another group.  May be wrong, but have been a long time
in ICANN...

  Ron A:@ Philip: Well said! ;o)

  stephane van gelder:understood Richard, thx.

  stephane van gelder:that clarification helps a lot

  Ron A:What does question #4 mean?

  Philip:@ron Q4 may help the BRG respond, and another time a BRG member

  Chuck Gomes (RySG):@ Ron: If you were authorized to respond for the BC,
you would list the BC.

  Ron A:Thanks Larisa.  That helps me, but I hope respondents will get it.

  Ron A:It appears that Chuck and Philip did, so I'll step back on this.

  Ron A:One take away from thsi meeting for me is that we need to get a
couple of WG questions into the survey...

  Philip:A helpful call - many thanks everyone

  Mary Wong:Not sure if this helps, as it doesn't reach the full pool you're
hoping for, but existing WG Guidelines do require a WG Self Assessement
survey after a WG competes its work.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy