[bc-gnso] ICANN53 Buenos Aires GAC Communiqué

[Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

GAC Communique is 
here<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-06-24-en>.    Highlights 
below:

Country and Territory Names at the Second Level
The GAC is continuing to develop a database of country requirements for 
notification of requests for release of country/territory names at the second 
level in new gTLDs (reserved according to the application rules for new gTLDs), 
with options for governments to state that they do not object to release and 
abstain from notifications for such requests.  This should be finalised by the 
end of July 2015 and published on the GAC website.

CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal
GAC states support for its submission to the ICG, without prejudice to comments 
made publicly by individual delegations.  GAC notes provisions of paragraph 106 
of the CWG Final Proposal which states that the CWG-Stewardship proposal is 
significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the implementation of 
ICANN-level accountability mechanisms by the Cross Community Working Group on 
Enhancing ICANN Accountability. If any element of these ICANN level 
accountability mechanisms is not implemented as contemplated by the 
CWG-Stewardship proposal, this CWG-Stewardship proposal will require revision.

Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Acountability (CCWG- 
Accountability)
GAC is continuing to clarify issues of concern to GAC members with regard to 
the evolving proposals of the CCWG-Accountability. These will be conveyed to 
the CCWG face-to-face meeting to be held on 17-18 July 2015.

gTLD Safeguards
GAC appreciates the efforts of the Board New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC) to 
respond to GAC’s Safeguard advice. However, despite guidance provided by GAC, 
contracts with the new gTLD Applicants have continued without the GAC 
recommended provisions requiring verification of credentials for domains in 
highly regulated sectors.
Nonetheless, the GAC notes that an increasing number of Registries and 
Applicants for strings related to highly regulated sectors have, consistent 
with GAC advice, voluntarily committed to undertaking the verification and 
validation of credentials. These Applicants and Registries demonstrate that 
satisfactory solutions can be achieved based on the GAC advice.

GAC recommends that the NGPC create a list of commended public interest 
commitment (PIC) examples related to verification and validation of credentials 
for domains in highly regulated sectors to serve as a model. These public 
interest commitments could demonstrate a best practice for other gTLD registry 
operators. For example the PIC for .bank appears to have taken steps to provide 
confidence to consumers that they can rely on the bona fide of the Registrants 
listed. Relevant stakeholders should be identified and encouraged to devise a 
set of PICs that work well for the protection of public interests in each of 
the new gTLDs related to highly regulated sectors.

The GAC additionally recommends: that the ICANN community creates a harmonised 
methodology to assess the number of abusive domain names within the assessment 
of the new gTLD program.   It would be useful to develop a straightforward 
scorecard on all elements of GAC Safeguard advice since the Beijing 2013 GAC 
Communiqué to clarify what elements of GAC advice have been implemented, what 
remains, and what has not been accepted for Implementation. In any instances of 
complete or partial rejection of the Advice, the GAC urges the NGPC to clarify 
the milestones intended to be followed in order to seek a potentially “mutually 
acceptable solution” as mandated by ICANN’s Bylaws.

Community Priority Evaluation
GAC continues to  review the community application process for new gTLDs, 
noting that it does not appear to have met applicant expectations.