Strongly Opposed to Proposed .BIZ, .INFO and .ORG Registry Agreement Changes
- To: biz-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Strongly Opposed to Proposed .BIZ, .INFO and .ORG Registry Agreement Changes
- From: frupp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:02:06 -0400
To the ICANN Board,
I am opposed to the proposed changes to the Contracts for the .biz .info and
.org Regstries specifically:
Lifting of Price Controls on Registry Services.
ICANN's Role is to provide Stability to the DNS, the internet, and to the
Domain Registrants/Companies that have become "The Internet"...These Changes do
everything, but, promote stability.
The "Lifting of Price Controls on Registry Services." gives monopolistic
control to each of the .biz, .info, and .org Registries and ensures anti
Competive Pricing by lifting Caps on Registration Costs.
It allows the Registry to charge whatever they can get away with, as they are
unhindered by contractual obligations to continue to provide their service with
only a small incremental price increase...
Giving them free reign to charge what ever the market will bare...
These Changes not only are contrary to that concept...they would be a bigger
disruption to the Internet Businesses using those extensions, than SiteFinder's
brief .com life ever was.
Other Standardized Terms. Consistent with the proposed new .COM registry
agreement, each of the proposed .BIZ, .INFO and .ORG registry agreements
contains a Section 3.1(f) on the use for statistical purposes only of "traffic
data." The 2005 .NET registry agreement did not contain this provision, however
the inclusion of this provision was negotiated by each of the .BIZ, .INFO and
.ORG registry operators to provide for consistency with the proposed new .COM
registry agreement, although this does not imply that these registries will
implement said provision.
Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude Registry Operator from making
commercial use of. or collecting, traffic data regarding domain names or
non-existant domain names for purposes such as , without limitation, the
determination of availability and health of the internet, pinpointing specific
points of failure, characterizing attacks and misconfigurations, identifying
compromised networks and hosts and promoting the sale of domain names, provided
however, that such use does not disclose domain name registrant or end user
information or other Personal Data as defined in section 3.1(c) (i) for any
purpose not otherwise authorized by this agreement. The process for the
introduction of new Registry Services shall not apply to such traffic data.
Nothing contained in this section 3.1 (f) shall be deemed to constitute consent
or acquiesdence by ICANN to an introduction by Registry Operator of a service
employing a Wild Card function. To the extent that traffic data subject to th!
is provision is made available, access shall be on terms that are
In plain english this says...If the Registry does not disclose domain name
registrant or end user information or other Personal Data as defined in section
3.1(c) (i) for any purpose not otherwise authorized by this agreement....it can
collect, traffic data regarding domain names or non-existant domain names,
gather whatever information about any quarries to their TLD that they can, and
they can use that information any way they want to, and sell it to whomever can
come up with the price, they set on it.
Nondiscriminatory from what standpoint certainly not from a "Free for use"
standpoint...as these would obviously be "Fee For Use of Information"
Services...any Fee for use, is discriminatory, to someone that cannot afford it.
Combine these 2 Changes to the Contract, and you have Registry Systems that
are Monopolies, that can determine interest and value of: any existing
registered (or future domain of interest) Domain, and the Right to get whatever
they want for its Registration...leaving the millions of Registrants with a 6
month window to either go out of business, or come up with what ever extorted
amount, the Registry sets as the yearly fee for the Registration of their
specific domain, based on arbitrary values the Registry determines they can get
from a competitor that may want a Domain.
I'd like to know if ICANN even thought to send out these ridiculous Proposed
Change's to these Contracts; To the MILLIONS of Registrants/Businesses in these
TLD's that would be effected...and that could be put out of business, by the
acceptance of these Contract changes.
Forrester D. Rupp
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM.
All on demand. Always Free.