Summary and Analysis of Comments For CAC UDRP Pilot project

[Amy Stathos <amy.stathos@xxxxxxxxx>]

Summary and Analysis of Comments For CAC UDRP Pilot Project


ICANN staff has prepared this summary and analysis of comments received on the 
CAC UDRP Pilot Project.  The comment period ran from 22 July 2009 to 21 August 
2008.  Eight comments were received by eigth individuals (seven off topic and 
appeared to be Spam).  The public comments on this forum are archived at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/cac-pilot/.

Summary:

Only one comment addressed the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC) Pilot Project.  
Kristine Dorrain, Internet Legal Counsel for the National Arbitration Forum, 
noted that while there is need to streamline processes for providing mandatory 
hard copies and effecting initial service upon the domain name registrant, CAC 
is not well poised to evaluate the efficiency of the streamlining of the 
process.  She noted that the National Arbitration Forum, a current UDRP 
provider, is better suited to evaluate the efficiencies and proposed to 
"conduct this project in tandem with the CAC", conduct the same type of trial 
and "offer additional analysis".

The remaining comments were unsolicited advertising or comments bearing no 
relation to any topic under consideration.  Those comments are not further 
summarized or identified here.

Contributor:

Kristine Dorrain on behalf of the National Arbitration Forum.




Amy A. Stathos
Deputy General Counsel
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
amy.stathos@xxxxxxxxx
+1-310-301-3866