Re: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNC WG
- To: "Chris Disspain" <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNC WG
- From: HiroHOTTA <hotta@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:37:58 +0900
I think it's a viable suggestion.
I sent out some comments on the current version last
night, but they can be regarded as comments for
refinement of the document and may well be solved in
the implementation phase.
I agree to sign off the document and send it to the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:02:25 +1000 (EST)
"Chris Disspain" <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks at this stage that the GAC and ccNSO council are likely to
> resolve positively regarding the report. If that is the case then I wonder
> if we really do need to meet tomorrow at 8 am rather than complete our
> task by email.
> Our only remaining talk will be to take the acceptance of the document by
> the GAC and ccNSO and send the report to the ICANN Board together with a
> note of the resolutions of the ccNSO and GAC. This is pursuant to the
> Are we simply able to agree by email that Young Eum and Manal (as joint
> chairs) do that?
> Chris Disspain
> CEO - auDA
> Australia's Domain Name Administrator
> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
> confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
> use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
> received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
> message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this