<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ccnso-idncctld] Linguistic Experts Committee
- To: Chris Disspain <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ccnso-idncctld] Linguistic Experts Committee
- From: "J. William Semich" <bill@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 16:53:56 -0400
Hello Chris et al;
In the interest of maintaining the "fast track" approach, as well as
maintaining as neutral an approach as possible to the factors IANA
uses in considering a delegation or redelegation of a ccTLD, I
suggest modifying the language in the document titled "Some notes on
the Committee of Linguistic Experts and Technical Committee" to
better reflect IANA practice and the language of RFC-1591 and ICP-1.
Here's the original language in that paragraph:
It is an overarching principle that the methodology has to take into
account and
be based on current practices for delegation and re-delegation. Under
those
IANA does due diligence to check that there is support/acceptance
from the
relevant stakeholders, including the relevant public authority in the
territory. It
is the responsibility of the proposed IDN ccTLD operator to submit
satisfactory
evidence of the demonstrated support/acceptance in territory.
I suggest you modify the language of the first full paragraph of that
document.
Here's my proposed new paragraph, with my proposed changes and
additions in upper case:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
It is an overarching principle that the methodology has to take into
account and
be based on current practices for delegation and re-delegation. Under
those
IANA does due diligence to check that there is COMMUNICATION WITH
[DELETE: "support/acceptance from"] the
relevant stakeholders, including the relevant public authority in the
territory, AND THAT THE RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS HAVE BEEN INFORMED AND
SUPPORT/ACCEPT, OR AT A MINIMUM DO NOT OBJECT TO, THE DELEGATION. It
is the responsibility of the proposed IDN ccTLD operator to submit
satisfactory evidence [DELETE: of the demonstrated] THAT APPROPRIATE
COMMUNICATION WITH RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS HAS BEEN MADE AND THAT THERE
IS support/acceptance, OR AT A MINIMUM NO OBJECTION, in THE territory.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
I believe abiding by these small changes in the language will assure
that the "fast track" is, in fact, fast.
Regards,
Bill Semich
.NU Domain
On May 9, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Chris Disspain wrote:
All,
Attached are some notes that Bart and I have prepared looking at
the Linguistic Committee idea. Hopefully they will be useful for
our discussions on Monday.
Cheers,
Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
Australia's Domain Name Administrator
ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.auda.org.au
Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for
the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this
email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify
the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the
environment before printing this email.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|