ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[ccnso-idncctld]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ccnso-idncctld] Final draft Final Report IDNC WG

  • To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, "ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx" <ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ccnso-idncctld] Final draft Final Report IDNC WG
  • From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:54:20 -0700

Dear all,
It seems some of you have not received the documents or there is a page 
missing. I've checked this version (again) and there seems to be no problem at 
my end. I'll send a clean version in a second email,
Bart


On 6/24/08 1:14 AM, "Bart Boswinkel" <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear all,
Included is  the final draft (with track changes and clean). This draft is the 
final draft. It is for discussion by the GAC and the ccNSO.

I  suggest that the IDNC WG will meet on Thursday morning at 8 am to have its 
final meeting to endorse the Final Report. I'll send out a final version for 
approval by the IDNC WG Wednesday evening. This version is for submission to 
the Board on Thursday. I'll also arrange a room for the meeting and let you 
know where the meeting can take place.

Changes:
This version includes some  changes to wording as suggested by Bertrand. It 
does not include  his suggested change of the re-evaluation recommendation. 
Reason is that in some cases the delegation process can take quite some time. 
It also does not include include his suggested change of " evaluated candidate 
string" as this would introduce a new concept.

In accordance with the suggestion of Cary the description of non-Latin is 
changed.

In order to avoid confusion with existing ccTLD,, for example the .PY issue ( 
the homographic issue), one more technical requirement has been added. Also 
included is a new statement that the technical criteria may need to be updated 
to comply with the IDNA 2008 protocol, when the review of IDNA protocol is 
concluded.This update is considered to be a matter of implementation.

Finally, next to UNESCO, the ICC and the WTO are included as examples of 
entities that could authenticate the meaning of the selected string.

This report will be published on the ICANN website and forwarded to the GAC and 
the ccNSO.
Kind regards,
Bart

Attachment: final draft final report (redline) .doc
Description: final draft final report (redline) .doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy