ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [cctld-discuss] Internet archeology.

  • To: cctld-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [cctld-discuss] Internet archeology.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:44:13 +0100

I'm not complaining at Lesley, but please can people refrain from
pointless cross-posting?

I mean, why on earth would the IAB and IESG be interested?

(That is a rhetorical question. Please don't even think about
answering it.)


On 2007-01-04 10:53, lesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Jefsey,

You wrote on 04/01/2007 02:06:51:
2) the former or incorrect two letters code assignments should all follow the same management rule. The first one to be considered is ".uk", which should be replaced by ".gb".

As Andrzej has already noted, this would reverse the previous election by the UK local internet community and would be highly likely to upset the 5,500,000 registrants under .uk.

Probably not the best of your many ideas.



Nominet UK

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy