<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
".security" as a "closed domain for Symantec only ---- not a good thing
- To: <comments-closed-generic-05feb13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ".security" as a "closed domain for Symantec only ---- not a good thing
- From: George Girardello <gx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:32:06 -0500
To Whom It May Concern:
"closed generic" domains should not be permitted." Helpful talking points
for your consideration:
* We support an Internet that is open and focused and has room for the
security and alarm industry.
* Generic words cannot and should not be owned for the exclusive use
of one company.
* A closed generic domain is not in the public interest.
* If ICANN permits any company to possess a "closed domain" -
including Symantec (a computer company) to use ".security" then the security
and alarm industry could be lost.
* Closed use of ".security" is not similar to the way ".com," ".net"
and ".org" are used on the Internet daily.
* Therefore, we believe a closed generic application for ".security"
is anticompetitive and we request that ICANN require applicants for closed
generic TLDs to either open the TLD or withdraw for a full refund.
* He vendors, i.e. GoDaddy.com would lose business.
Thank you,
George Girardello
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|