<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
“closed generic” domains should not be permitted
- To: comments-closed-generic-05feb13@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: “closed generic” domains should not be permitted
- From: David Wilson <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:08:09 -0400
Attention:
Dr. David Crocker, Chairman of the Board
Mr. Fadi Chehade’, President & CEO
Mr. Cherine Chalaby, Chair of the New gTLD Committee
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
My business feels strongly regarding the following:
- We support an Internet that is open and focused and has room for the
security and alarm industry.
- Generic words cannot and should not be owned for the exclusive use of
one company.
- A closed generic domain is not in the public interest.
- If ICANN permits any company to possess a “closed domain” – including
Symantec (a computer company) to use “.security” then the security and
alarm industry could be lost.
- Closed use of “.security” is not similar to the way “.com,” “.net” and
“.org” are used on the Internet daily.
- Therefore, we believe a closed generic application for “.security” is
anticompetitive and we request that ICANN require applicants for closed
generic TLDs to either open the TLD or withdraw for a full refund.
Thanks you for your consideration of my comments.
Regards,
**
__________________
David C. Wilson
President
Wilsons Security
david@xxxxxxxxxx
main: 902-468-4757
mobile: 902-789-6457
wilsonssecurity.ca
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|