Network Solutions & CentralNic. <> SCOTUS informal Notice of Service in ICANN Et Al.
<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hello Network Solutions, ICANN "Accredited Registry" & CentralNic Ltd "Domain Name Registrant" . Bcc Katten Law:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Until all facets of The United States Government investigate ICANN; and Your client NETWORK SOLUTIONS, illustrious & industrious #RySG Stakeholder ways, I don't want ICANN to evade US Antitrust Law.</div><div><br></div><div><div>Within this same investigation of ICANN, it's critical that the United States Government understand how Your OTHER client CENTRALNIC LTD, a Cybersquatting, Domain Name Registrant; and subject of the RAA 3.7.7.8 under ICANN, also under Network Solutions, as their Domain Name Registry for ".UK.com" has become the "Contributory Infringer" when they're responsible to help ICANN enforce the RAA, to stave-off Infringement.</div><div><br></div><div>It's also important, that the United States Government learn how CentralNic managed to evade US Law, aided by WIPO as coordinated by Dr. Francis Gurry, an appointee of the NTIA, assigned to uphold Law, shortly after the MoU creating ICANN.</div><div><br></div><div>Talk about Conflicts of Interest within ICANN ... Network Solutions should have been aware of "Dilution" an integral part of US Law 15 U.S. Code § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden, before they ventured off, to violate 18 U.S. Code § 2320 - Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services ... etc, selling Dilutive "SubDomain" names for CentralNic.</div><div><br></div><div>It's for reasons such as my "exceptional" and "extraordinary" problem, that the nefarious conduct of those within ICANN's Ilk, having "harmed" many, that the United States Government needs to diligently investigate ICANN's conduct, related to "Accountability" before they're liberated.</div><div><br></div></div><div>Please read the attached > <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; "><a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdflnCOm34BsH.pdf";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdflnCOm34BsH.pdf</a></span> < which will be sent to your Attorney's of Record at Katten Law, in Bcc.</div><div><br></div><div>I look forward to thoughtfully resolving my problem; and eliminating the violations of American Antitrust Law, to protect Enterprise, along with our clients, The Consumers.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Graham Schreiber, Pro Se.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div></div></body></html> Attachment:
ICANN Et Al at SCOTUS..pdf <html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "></body></html> |