ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[comments-emerck-hamburg-berlin-amendment-02mar15]


<<< Chronological Index >>>        Thread Index >>>

Business Constituency (BC) comment on Release of Geo-Names in .EMERCK, .HAMBURG and .BERLIN TLDs

  • To: "comments-emerck-hamburg-berlin-amendment-02mar15@xxxxxxxxx" <comments-emerck-hamburg-berlin-amendment-02mar15@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Business Constituency (BC) comment on Release of Geo-Names in .EMERCK, .HAMBURG and .BERLIN TLDs
  • From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:31:21 +0000

The Business Constituency (“BC”) appreciates the opportunity to provide 
comments to the proposed amendments to the .EMERCK, .BERLIN, and .HAMBURG 
registry agreements submitted through the Registry Services Evaluation Policy 
(“RSEP”) on 23-Jan-2015, 08-Feb-2015, and 08-Feb-2015 respectively, and posted 
for public comment on 2-Mar-2015 at 
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/emerck-hamburg-berlin-amendment-2015-03-02-en.



The .EMERCK Request



In its RSEP request, Registry Operator Merck KGaA seeks the release of all 
country and territory names, as defined in Section 4 of Specification 5 of the 
Registry Agreement, at all levels of the .EMERCK TLD.  The BC fully supports 
this request. [see endnote 1]



The BC believes that the use of country and territory names will allow such a 
.BRAND registry to segment its TLD in a way that is meaningful to Internet 
users around the globe.  Geographic segmentation will bring greater efficacy to 
.BRAND TLDs, ultimately benefitting businesses and consumers by helping the 
registry operator target content to audiences in specific geographic regions, 
using linguistically appropriate domain names and content.



In addition, we firmly believe that the release of country and territory names 
for .BRAND TLDs will enhance security and trust in online commerce by 
permitting businesses to exercise more control over the security and stability 
of their customized web sites.



Finally, the BC notes the historical availability of country and territory 
names at all levels in all legacy TLDs.  .BRAND TLDs should be afforded the 
same freedom to allocate such names, given that the risk of abuse or confusion 
by the use of such names in a .BRAND registry is low – likely much lower than 
their use in legacy TLDs.



For all these reasons, the BC fully supports this proposal and urges ICANN to 
amend the registry agreement for the .EMERCK TLD accordingly.



The .BERLIN and .HAMBURG Requests


In their RSEP requests, Registry Operators dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG and Hamburg 
Top-Level-Domain GmbH seek the release of all country and territory names, as 
defined in Section 4 of Specification 5 of the Registry Agreement, at all 
levels of the .BERLIN and .HAMBURG TLDs, respectively.  The BC fully supports 
these requests as well.



Geographic TLDs such as .BERLIN and .HAMBURG, which by definition have the 
backing and support of the official governments of their respective 
municipalities, represent secure, stable, and safe spaces where the likelihood 
of abuse or misconduct in the use of country and territory names is low.  
Further, because of the geographical nature of these TLDs, use of country and 
territory names at other levels of the TLDs is not likely to confuse the public 
as to any official affiliation between the domain and the country or territory.



In addition, the ability to use country and territory names at all levels in 
geographic TLDs would allow enhanced community-building for Internet users in 
those geographic areas, as well as enable businesses in those geographic areas 
to provide targeted service to those communities.  For example, INDIA.BERLIN 
could facilitate the development of a trusted online space for the Berlin-based 
Indian community, or the development of a trusted online space to enhance 
Berlin residents’ access to travel, tourism, and trade with India.  These 
opportunities for enriched competition, choice, and innovation serve the goals 
of the new gTLD program.



Finally, the BC notes the historical availability of country and territory 
names at the second level in all legacy TLDs.  Geographic TLDs such as .BERLIN 
and .HAMBURG should be afforded the same freedom to allocate such names, given 
that the risk of abuse or confusion by the use of such names in these 
registries is no higher than their use in legacy TLDs.



For all these reasons, the BC fully supports these proposals and urges ICANN to 
amend the registry agreements for the .BERLIN and .HAMBURG TLDs accordingly.


________________________________

[1] The BC has previously supported the release of country and territory names 
at all levels in .BRAND TLDs; this comment aligns with those prior comments.  
See Business Constituency comment on Neustar's proposal for country and 
territory names (Nov. 8, 2014), available at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ctn-release-neustar-19sep14/pdfjYdQmbpklt.pdf;
 Business Constituency comment on Release of Country and Territory Names in 
.BMW and .MINI TLDs (Jan. 24, 2015), available at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-bmw-mini-amendment-11dec14/msg00001.html.


These comments were drafted by Andy Abrams and approved in accordance with our 
charter.


Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency




<<< Chronological Index >>>        Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy