<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
ICANN - FHE "Public Comment" on “Closed Generic” gTLD applications for .hotel(s)
- To: "comments-gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13@xxxxxxxxx" <comments-gac-safeguard-advice-23apr13@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ICANN - FHE "Public Comment" on “Closed Generic” gTLD applications for .hotel(s)
- From: Julie Besse <Julie.Besse@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:19:26 +0000
Public Comment on “New gTLD Board Committee Consideration of GAC Safeguard
Advice”
1. FHE (French Hospitality in Europe) regroups the five French associations
(CPIH, FAGIHT, GNC, SYNHORCAT and UMIH) representing the hospitality industry
in France, i.e. all the professionals of the Hotels Restaurants and Cafés
sector belonging to a trade union. France is the major tourism destination in
the world (and in Europe), with 200 million visitors in 2011, including 81
million tourists.
2. On 23 April 2013, Icann opened a comment on “New gTLD Board Committee
Consideration of GAC Safeguard Advice”, in order to solicit input on how the
New gTLD Board Committee should address GAC advice regarding safeguards
applicable to broad categories of New gTLD strings.
3. In this respect, FHE publicly reasserts its opposition to the
applications of OTAs (Online Travel Agencies) based on a “Closed Registry”
model, for .hotel (application #1-1249-36568 by Despegar Online SRL), .hotels
(application #1-1016-75482 by Booking.com B.V.), .hoteis (application
#1-1249-87712 by Despegar Online SRL), and .hoteles (application #1-1249-1940
by Despegar Online SRL).
4. FHE supports the GAC in this approach aiming to avoid the establishing
of monopolies and ultimately protect consumer interests.
5. FHE considers that restricting the use of a common generic term relating
to a market sector such as “hotel” to the exclusive benefit of OTAs could have
unintended consequences, including a negative impact on competition, but also
would be detrimental to the global Internet community, hotels and their
customers.
6. Indeed, the “Closed Registry” applicants seek to capture the sole use of
these generic terms for their own business. If the hotel(s) TLDs were delegated
to the applicants, OTAs would control and prevent others from registering
domain names within a string representing their own economic sector, thus
leading to a monopoly on the online reservation market, on each and every
booking transaction.
7. According to the economic studies from Google/Ipsos MediaCT and the
Institute of Tourism, University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland,
about 50% of online reservations are done through OTAs . As there is little
doubt that Search Engine Optimization (SEO) mechanisms will favor meaningful
TLDs, the operation by the applicants of the hotel(s) TLDs would exclude de
facto domains not in the hotel(s) TLDs namespace from the first results of
search engines. As a result, a 100% market share to the benefit of a single
stakeholder will replace 50% market share of the online reservations by OTAs,
with dramatic economic consequences for the Hotel Community members.
8. On top of operating counterfeit trademarks and encouraging unfair
competition practice, since competitors and non-affiliated entities will be
excluded from the hotel(s) TLDs, Internet users will be automatically
redirected to a limited choice of hotels in accordance with the applicants’
interests, and so may be deceived.
9. In addition, with a monopoly on the hotel(s) TLDs, the applicants will
be in a position to dictate their commercial conditions to their business
partners and prevent access to the namespace to those who are not business
partners.
10. And last, the combination of market advantages from control of the
hotel(s) TLDs may create steep barriers to entry for others in the hotel
industry and will ultimately harm the interests of consumers in that market.
11. Like the French Government and the long list of opponents, FHE is
convinced that allowing “Closed Generic” gTLD applications will be a source of
distortion of competition and consumer misleading. The Affirmation of
Commitments defines the ICANN objectives which include promoting competition,
consumer trust and consumer choice. Allowing “Closed Generic” gTLD applications
will produce the exact opposite effect.
12. FHE urges the ICANN to implement the GAC Advice safeguards and to forbid
any “Closed Generic” gTLD application for a generic term.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|