<<<
Chronological Index
>>>
Thread Index
>>>
public comment
- To: comments-iag-whois-05oct15@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: public comment
- From: Ron Baione <ron.baione@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:42:27 -0700
Most governments affected by privacy advocates would tend not enact a law
stating that Whois must all of a sudden show the general public private
information, but there is always that possibility I auppose. The fact that
this policy hasn't been used once since 2005 could lead one to believe
Whois is 100% compliant with all requests for customer information. Therefore
maybe this policy needs to be strengthened or clarified to ensure customer
privacy with specific language relating to requests from authorities and
requests from countries that lack any discernable democratic structure.
Once the U.S. Government transfer occurs, customers may seek clarity on whether
or not Whois changed its policy of compliance with requests for information
from governments that don't have a stringent set of privacy laws. The
internationalization and corporatization of the transition prpcess may cause
some people to confuse the privacy issue, and they may not purchase domains
thinking that foreign governments will now have better legal authority to
request Whois information they previously were prevented from seeing, because
of the U.S. government's previous role in ownership and oversight of the
system.
Ron Baione-Doda
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>
Thread Index
>>>
|