NIC.br comment on Lack of Transparency in CQs

[Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>]

Besides supporting the RySG comments on a number of matter of the new gTLD 
program implementation, we would like to add that the lack of transparency in 
issuance of CQs made no information available regarding CQs for questions with 
public answers or for which questions with non-public answers that received 
CQs. ICANN should have published the CQs and answers for the public questions 
and indicate which applications received CQs on which non-public questions, 
although not publishing content in such cases.


Rubens Kühl
NIC.br <http://nic.br/>