<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
41 reasons why exposing personal data is a bad idea!
- To: "comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx" <comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: 41 reasons why exposing personal data is a bad idea!
- From: Two Day <today_twoday@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:02:32 +1030
Dear ICANN –
Regarding the proposed rules
governing companies that provide WHOIS privacy services (as set forth in
the Privacy and Policy Services Accreditation Issues Policy document):
I urge you to respect internet users' rights to privacy and due process.
- Everyone deserves the right to privacy.
-
No one’s personal information should be revealed without a court order,
regardless of whether the request comes from a private individual or
law enforcement agency.
Private information should be kept private. Full stop. Especially when it
belongs to people who consider themselves vulnerable in some way!!
I would ask you to seriously consider the reason why people have chosen to have
their personal data kept private:
Many home businesses, microbusiness, "investment websites" are run from peoples
residential addresses because they cannot afford to rent separate business
premises.Often the people that have bought domains or are running home based
businesses have been forced to work from home because they are too sick to
find/keep a standard job, single women, single mothers, been made reductant,
......ie they are vulnerable to loss of livelihood, personal security, attack
(burgular looking for passwords to their business or domain account), hackers
etcMany people wish to keep their personal data personal to reduce likelihood
of personal, physical attack or bullying or ridicule, or loss of life etc.
Examples of type of people that are extra cautious about giving out personal
information include been whistleblowers, refugees, politically vulnerable, have
enemies (or ex spouses), been victims of domestic violence, suffering trauma
from previous attack on their life or home intrusion.Parents wish to protect
their children by not making their physical address or contact details public.
Many people running home based businesses or mobile businesses (we come to you)
share houses/addresses/accomodation with other people. This means that not only
would icann expose the domain name holders personal details, but also unrelated
parties addresses (which is unethical). Thus people can have their personal
data exposed by their housemates without their permission or knowledge.
Exposing their personal data would alos be exposing their email address or
other information that they have used as a username for their domain account or
their websites. This increases the liklihood of hackers because they now know
the username or can research it or more easily guess the username for accounts.
Domain accounts should have the same status as bank accounts for security
reasons.Banks and governments have been strongly advising people to keep their
personal data personal for years. Exposing personal data would then increase
fraud.
Many people have chosen to put a lot of personal information about their life
in their blogs (eg Its my birthday today, or I own this valuable asset, or I am
sick with this condition (therefore more vulnerable for attack)) which is safe
if no one knows where they live and do not have other personal information.
Exposing personal data by icann will then provide criminals with valuable
pieces of the jigsaw to hack or steal domains, burgle their homes, attack them
physically, steal their identity and then all their assets &livelihood.People
often buy domain names for their new business idea, invention, new product, or
trade secret years before the idea is ready to be made into a website. Exposing
personal data could lead to loss of intellect property, give competitors an
unfair advantage, make all their product development and research void.Many
people make their domain ownership private to improve the SEO (search engine
optimisation) of their network/portfolio of websites. Exposing domain ownership
when then give google and other search engines the ability to nullify the value
of many incoming links to websites when ranking the website for SEO purposes.
Exposing personal data could then take away business, cause traffic to
completely dry up and then result on loss of business income and
livelihood.Many people do not want others to know what they own or their
investments, as the best way to protect wealth is to not advertise that you
have it. People perceived as wealthy (which could include domain name & website
holders) including their children would then become greater targets for
kidnapping, theft, hacking etcOther people do not want people to know that they
are "wealthy" or an entrenpeneur because this can attract false friends, or
romantic partners who find their wealth more attractive than them as an
individual.Similarly aged or terminal people could suddenly find they get extra
attention (non genuine), because they could be included in an inheritance (if
domain/website/business ownership can be inherited). (But who never paid them
any attention until they realised it could be financially beneficial to do so,
thus "deceiving"/false motives the aged relative/friend and stealing from the
family/friends that had been caring for them their whole life.
People make their personal data because they do not want to be spammed, have
unsolicited phone calls, & have unsolicited people knocking on their doors.Most
people would agree that it is easier and more affordable to keep your private
information private rather than pay for home security, body guards, or move
out of shared accomodation, pay for extra insurance (if available), or keeping
moving residences to move away from problem people.Making personal data public
increases the ability of con-men to target people for crime.Making addresses
and personal details public increases likehood of untrustworthy people using
legitimate causes for home access such as cleaning, nursing, repairs &
maintenance, rental inspections, sale of realestate being on the lookout for
personal information, computers, smart phones, passwords that may have been
written down somewhere, because they now know who has something valuable to
them that they can target.It would be worthless paying for a silent number, if
icann is going to advertise it to the world.Many people regularly use paper
shredders or pay companies to shred their paperwork, to protect the data that
icann wants to advertise to the world.Many people would consider making public
their online shopping transactions, real estate portfolio, or entries in their
bank accounts of similar magnitude to making their domain transactions
public.Buyers of existing domains, websites, businesses with a web presence
would have an unfair advantage in negotiations as they could research the
sellers personal details and interests, and motives in selling, and what price
they might accept. Whereas the seller could not research the buyers perspective
or position.
I would anticipate these potential consequences if icann exposes peoples
personal data:
Loss of goodwill and trust in Icann, which would not be able to be
regained.Public outcry.
Strict Government Laws about privacy that website and companies have to adhere
to (which are valid due to customers real concerns about privacy, safety and
identity theft, spam etc) will become a joke, if website owners and domain
holders are not entitled to the same level of privacy for the same reasons.
Increased use of false names, pen names and pseudo names when signing up for
new accounts. Data quality for icann would decrease. Whilst making it harder
for users to manage, or verify if their account was hacked.Increased expiration
(rather than renewal) of domains (less income to icann), by those concerned
about their privacy.
Also increase "on sale" of domains by those concerned about their privacy. New
providers of new TLD's are likely to have a loss of business.
Creation of un necessary fear in domain owners, especially vulnerable
(refugeees, single women/mothers, sick, whistleblowers, sharemates, ex spouses,
those forced to work from home etc).
Potential litigation against icann for exposing their personal details where it
can be linked to crime, bullying, hacking, loss of life etc
Extra spam which will result in requests for icann to provide free
comprehensive software to reduce spam - not sure whether any such software is
possible to make.Extra hacking into domain accounts (username likely to be
guessed/researched), plus targeting of higher value accounts.Extra bank fraud
with regard to bank accounts and identity theft, as personal ID data would then
be available publically.Domain providers would then need to provide the
facility to regularly change user names as well as passwords.
Financial compensation would be sought by domain owners who have paid money to
"Who is" (and similar) to pretect their privacy, and previous money spent would
now be null and void... ie no need to have paid for it in first place if
personal details was later going to be exposed/advertised.
Can icann afford to refund every domain owner that has paid for privacy
services that would then become null?
Icann would put some companies out of business, obviously "whois", but also
website owners relying on SEO to market their website and get traffic to
it.Many of the reasons for exposing icann customers personal details are likely
to be negated by all of the side effects of doing so.
Many people would consider exposing their personal details illegal and a breach
of privacy, so some litigation could be expected.Is Icann going to be offering
free insurance and guarantees against domain theft, personal attack, business
fraud, bank fraud as a result of making vulnerable peoples personal details
public?Icann would be expected to pay for un necessary costs that they incur to
their customers. (Since the issue has now been highlighted to Icann). This
could include extra home security, business premise rental, body guards, safes
to store passwords and usernames in, extra medical costs incurred from results
of crime, compensation for loss of business, extra insurance costs etc etc.
Thank you for your consideration.
From Concerned Female Net Citizen in Australia.
Name with held as this email will be published on the internet. Happy to
provide if not made public.
Anne Homer
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|