<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Privacy Rights
- To: "comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx" <comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Privacy Rights
- From: Ty Carter <tmcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 02:06:56 +0000
To whom it may concern:
Regarding the proposed rules governing companies that provide WHOIS privacy
services (as set forth in the Privacy and Policy Services Accreditation Issues
Policy document):
I am a small business owner that is on the technology forefront and I for one
am HIGHLY offended that even the mere implication that an entity such as
MARKMONITOR could even think it reasonable to demand that my private monetary
transactions for an intellectual property transaction would have to be made
public in the way that would basically undermine the very structure of a
private contractual agreement for services between two parties, regardless of
the nature of the transaction.
If I, as an agent first for my clients, and then a private individual wish to
appoint and request agent / proxy services, via my registrar for my domain name
purchases, then that is my right to do so. NO ONE other than law enforcement
wielding a search warrant or other public govt agency, holding the same warrant
should not have to divulge that customer information... This is done all the
time in various transactions, including real estate and legal forms, such as a
legally binding Power of Attorney, or agent in fact.
The spurious theft of service that has been attempted from companies like
Domain Registry of America, even further suggest proxy hosting and the ability
to weed out the wheat from the chaff is still needed. I get weekly calls from
clients or clients that are emailing me scanned forged or masked "legit" domain
registry bills, some threatening to cut them off, and others luring the client
into a deceptive ring of theft of service or impersonation.. because some of
their transactional information is not maskable or proxied because of the very
nature of the domain name that has been transacted for.
I want my domains private and if there is a need for contact, my registrar
knows how to legitimately contact me...
Now... That brings to bear another issue...
Should you like to discuss this matter and my opinion further in detail, I
would welcome any and all dialogue concerning this issue....
I would propose the following adoption of rulemaking....
I do think it is entirely reasonable to ensure the registrar has valid contact
and account information for EVERY domain, even if the client wishes anonymous
or proxied registration... but the registrar should be required to make annual
or biannual contact with the domain owners to validate still current contact
information. If the registrar can not contact or does not receive a response
within 90 days of initial contact to validate, and the clients domain it paid,
then the registrar should, under their own discretion be placed in an
"unverified" status and the domain name suspended when and only when contact
can not be made.
Thank you for your patience in this matter,
Respectfully submitted, I am;
Ty Carter, President
Strategic Network Consultants, Inc.
524 East 9th Street
Washington, NC 27889
252-946-0351 .::. Office
252-402-5296 .::. Cell
Email: tmcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tmcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Visit us on the web at
http://www.strategicconsultants.net<http://www.strategicconsultants.net/>
[cid:image001.png@01D0AF92.D21B87D0]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|