<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
PPSAI Initial Report
- To: "comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx" <comments-ppsai-initial-05may15@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: PPSAI Initial Report
- From: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:09:13 +0000
Dear Mary
Please see our comment from 1&1 Internet SE on the above subject matter:
The initial report has some interesting findings and as such we support the
majority of the findings from the WG. There are some issues which we feel we
should raise.
The suggestion that commercial organisations should be prohibited from using
privacy and proxy services is not supported by us and we believe that any
organisation, commercial or otherwise, should have the opportunity to avail
themselves of these services. This could be in relation to a new product
launch or indeed, as mentioned in the report, for freedom of speech reasons.
The decision whether to relay, reveal, publish or disclose seems fraught with
difficulty. While producing a court order (or any other such order) will
induce disclosure, is it to be suggested that a privacy and proxy provider has
to act as judge and jury to decide whether or not to publish or to disclose the
identity of a domain name owner? Web hosting companies face the same issue and
are not in a position to act as judge and jury and, therefore, we would suggest
that the same onerous burden is not put on these providers. It must also be
remembered that any complaint of abuse must be in relation to the domain name
only.
In view of the above, is it also suggested that any accredited privacy and
proxy provider would then be held liable for not publishing or disclosing the
identity of that domain name owner? If so, this surely would then achieve the
desired result of either publishing or disclosing the required identity as the
privacy and proxy provider may see this as too great a risk to continue to
provide the service.
We also strongly agree that content is not part of ICANN's or any working
group's remit and advise a definitive line is drawn between domain names and
content. While the working group has conclusively determined this same
outcome, we feel it is important to state this publicly.
We also feel that any privacy and proxy provider should be governed by national
law, in the same way as any other company. Regulations in certain countries
insist upon businesses putting their full contact details on their website.
Any accreditation process or ICANN rules must take national laws into
consideration.
Many thanks
Lindsay
Lindsay Hamilton-Reid
Legal Counsel
Direct: +44 (0)1452 509145 | Mobile: 07720 091147 | Email:
Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.1and1.co.uk<http://www.1and1.co.uk/>
[1and1-logo]
(c) 2014 All rights reserved. 1&1 is the trading name of 1&1 Internet Limited.
Company registration no. 03953678. Registered in England and Wales. Registered
office: Aquasulis House, 10-14 Bath Road, Slough SL1 3SA. VAT no. 752539027.
This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disclose,
copy or use any part of it - please delete all copies immediately and notify
1&1 on 0844 335 1211. Any statements, opinions or information in this message
are provided by the author, not on behalf of 1&1, unless subsequently confirmed
by an individual who is authorised to represent 1&1.
[linkedin]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/3346448?trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1400659533750%2Ctas%3A1%261%20lt%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%22>[twitter]<https://twitter.com/1and1_uk>[facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/1and1uk>[gplus]<https://plus.google.com/u/0/107542006422309702789/posts>[youtube]<https://www.youtube.com/user/1and1uk>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|