<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RDAP Implementation Comment Submission by Key-Systems GmbH
- To: comments-rdap-profile-03dec15@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RDAP Implementation Comment Submission by Key-Systems GmbH
- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0100
To Whom it may concern,
Key-Systems GmbH appreciates the opportunity provided by ICANN to
comment on the RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars.
Key-Systems GmbH supports the alternative framework proposed by Google
Inc. in its comments on Thick Whois/RDAP Implementation
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfXEuYViKmu4.pdf>.
We further support the comments of the RySG
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-rdap-profile-03dec15/pdfssl7te1KLl.pdf>
as well as the forthcoming comments of the Registrar Stakeholder Group.
Key-Systems GmbH firmly opposes any implementation without significant
benefit, i.e. implementation of new protocols that will not be a
significant improvement over currently existing systems, in this case
port 43 whois unless the policy work on how to implement the additional
features with regard to authenticated access and differential output is
complete.
Key-Systems GmbH also fimly opposes any implementation that will be
rendered obsolete within the forseeable future. As GNSO policy
recommendations to replace thin whois with thick whois in all gTLDs have
been accepted by the ICANN Board and are currently in the implementation
path, any implementation of a replacement protocol such as RDAP on the
side of the registrars would provide zero benefit to internet users but
result in significant implementation and opportunity costs on the side
of registrars. This implementation may further be rendered obsolete by
the ongoing policy work on the Replacement Data Protocol based on the
work of the EWG on gTLD Directory Services.
Section 3 of the Operational Profile describes implementation
requirements for registrars. The requirements for registrar
implementation should be consistent with the 2013 Registrar
Accreditation Agreement. This implementation requirement will require
registrars to commit significant resources to develop, deploy, and
operate a software service that will ultimately end up being discarded
very shortly afterward once all gTLD registries provide thick services
themselves. This is not a commercially reasonable requirement.
--
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|