IPC Comments Re Proposed String Confusion Objection Review Mechanism
Dear Ms. Willett:
Attached please find comments from the Intellectual Property Constituency
("IPC") regarding the proposed review mechanism to address perceived
inconsistent expert determinations on string confusion objections.
Thank you,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>
===========================================================
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the
Internal Revenue
Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used
and cannot be used
by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on
the taxpayer.
===========================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
intended for the exclusive
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is
proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing,
copying, disclosure or
distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or
sanction. Please notify
the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and
delete the original
message without making any copies.
===========================================================
NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability
partnership that has
elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
===========================================================
Attachment:
IPC Comments on Proposed String Confusion Objection Review.pdf |