ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[comments-spec13-06dec13]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Key-Systems Comments Re Specification 13

  • To: comments-spec13-06dec13@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Key-Systems Comments Re Specification 13
  • From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:13:39 +0100

Dear Cyrus,

thank you for providing us with the opportunity to comment on the proposed new Specification 13 to the Registry Agreement.

- We agree that it is appropriate that certain TLDs be classified as .Brand TLDs.

- We agree that a "cooling off" period prior to re-delegation may be appropriate, provided the beneficial use of Domain Names in the TLD remained limited to the Registry Operator and its Affiliates during its operation.

- The definition of .Brand TLD should however include one further requirement: "g. is not in itself a generic term and intended to be used for purposes defined by said generic term."

- The reason behind this being the potential for abuse of this new category due to possible existance of trademarks registered in one language that would not be registerable in another due to those strings constituting a generic term in the other language. If such TLDs would then be used in the sense of this generic term, this would create the ability to monopolize said generic term.

- We do not agree that there is a need to permit a Registry Operator for a .Brand TLD to limit its registrar use to one or more preferred accredited registrar(s), as no conclusive argument demonstrating a need for this permission besides cost savings has been proposed. We are convinced that the Registry Operator essentially has the ability to achieve this very result without any special permission by tailoring its eligibility requirements in a way that most registrars would find it unattractive to pursue or maintain an accreditation. Furthermore, as registrations in .Brand TLDs would be limited to a very exclusive circle of potential registrants, those registrants can choose the preferred registrar(s) for its registrations, which would result in no registrations amongst those registrars that are not preferred, thereby making the accreditation economically unviable.

- We further have great concerns however with regard to the potential consequenses resulting from the proposed ability of .Brand registries to extend registrations in their TLDs to "Trademark Licensees". As written "any written trademark license agreement with Registry Operator of its Affiliate" would be sufficient to allow the Registry Operator to grant the use to such licensees. This would allow a Registry Operator to simply grant a trademark license limited exclusively to the use of the domain name to whoever so desires. Essentially, such a licensee could be differentiated from a Registered Name Holder in an open TLD only in the of protections and rights he enjoys in an open TLD and the choice of registrars. Depending on the structure chosen by the registrant, any conceivably use could be permitted to any conceivable group of users under a limited trademark license, thereby completely circumventing the registry-registrar model.

Consider an open online marketplace that licenses its domain names to its sellers, creating shops on the platform of the marketplace under its Brand under a limited trademark license; consider the manufacturer of goods providing domain names to the users of said goods for value-added services and the ability of said users to present their use of these goods, granting a limited trademark license with each purchase.

Such uses are essentially identical to those of regular domain name registrations in open TLDs, but circumvent the registry-registrar model. This potentially goes far beyond vertical integration and grants a monopoly for TLDs that might also be open, but for one clause in their registration agreements that grants a license to use the trademark for this domain and its use.

We therefore oppose the inclusion of trademark licensees as eligible registrants in .Brand TLDs, unless the gaming potential can be eliminated by narrowing the definition of trademark licensees to exclude licenses granted only or mainly for the purpose of allowing the registration and/or use of the domain name.


--
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this 
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the 
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy