<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comments on Trusted Community Representation in Root Zone DNSSEC Key Signing Ceremonies
- To: comments-tcr-dnssec-key-signing-21jan14@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Comments on Trusted Community Representation in Root Zone DNSSEC Key Signing Ceremonies
- From: Burkov Dmitry <dvburk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:57:48 +0400
<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div class="page" title="Page 3">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div><font face="Calibri"
size="3"><br></font></div><div><font face="Calibri"
size="3"><br></font></div><div><font face="Calibri" size="3">My comments based
on personal experience as TCR for West Coast Ceremonies</font></div><div><div
class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><ol><li style="font-size: 12pt;
font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Is the current TCR
model effectively performing its function of ensuring trust in the KSK
management process?</span></p><div>yes</div></li><li style="font-size: 12pt;
font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Is the current size of
the TCR pool appropriate to ensure sufficient participation in the ceremonies,
while not overburdening the availability of specific
volunteers?</span></p><div>Yes</div></li><li style="font-size: 12pt;
font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Should there be a
minimum level of participation required of a TCR in order to be considered to
be successfully discharging their duties?</span></p><div><br></div><div>I think
that TCR should participate in ceremony as minimum once a year. Regarding last
experience to garantee </div><div>necessary number attending TCRs on
ceremonies - 3 of 5 ceremonies will be preferable.</div></li><li
style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size:
12pt;">There is no standard provision to refresh the list of TCRs except when
they are replaced due to inability to effectively perform their function.
Should there be a process to renew the pool of TCRs, such as using term limits
or another rotation mechanism?</span></p><div>I think that TCRs should have an
opportunity to participate once in KSK ceremony. It will also require to rotate
facilities.</div><div>Rotation should take in account others factors as TCRs
level of participation, etc</div><div><br></div></li><li style="font-size:
12pt; font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The current
model does not compensate TCRs for their services in order
to</span></p></li></ol><p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family:
Calibri;">ensure their independence from ICANN.</span></p><div><br></div><div>I
think it is still preferable that it should be done by third party
organizations.</div><div><br></div><ol style="list-style-type:
lower-latin;"><li style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri;"><p><span
style="font-size: 12pt;">Should the model of TCRs paying the costs of their
participation be retained?</span></p></li><li style="font-size: 12pt;
font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Would some form of
compensation to offset the expenses incurred by the TCRs detract from their
independence in performing the role?</span></p></li><li style="font-size: 12pt;
font-family: Calibri;"><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If you support
compensating TCRs for their expenses, are there requirements or limitations on
whom the funding organization should be?</span></p></li></ol></div></div><img
alt="page3image20224" width="419" height="3" apple-inline="yes"
id="452D7AF3-F8E1-4989-B265-528DBC98290D" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes"
src="cid:18F5D342-4113-467B-B6D3-1440B7FAC361"><img alt="page3image20384"
width="419" height="3" apple-inline="yes"
id="CC4200F2-0AA2-4491-A4FC-CDA16C9725C3" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes"
src="cid:7C5C94A7-9530-4955-AFE2-BB0C98E469D7"></div><div><br></div><div>Dmitry
Burkov</div></div></div></div></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|