My comments on the review of the TCRs(Comments from a TCR)

[ALAIN AINA <aalain@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

1. Is the current TCR model effectively performing its function of ensuring 
trust in the KSK management process?

Not as one could expect as  not all TCRs are able to join ceremonies.

2.      Is the current size of the TCR pool appropriate to ensure sufficient 
participation in the ceremonies, while not overburdening the availability of 
specific volunteers?


The pool seems ok and distribution  fair.


3.      Should there be a minimum level of participation required of a TCR in 
order to be considered to be successfully discharging their duties?


Yes. At least,  should attend one  of the two ceremonies each facility holds   
a year.


4.      There is no standard provision to refresh the list of TCRs except when 
they are replaced due to inability to effectively perform their function. 
Should there be a process to renew the pool of TCRs, such as using term limits 
or another rotation mechanism?


Not sure it is a good idea. May be in a new future, TCR may no longer be needed 
  and ceremonies done by staff and  open to people who want to attend 
physically and the rest  of the community witness remotely.


5.      The current model does not compensate TCRs for their services in order 
to ensure their independence from ICANN.


It should continue. No need to compensate TCRs for the services.

a.      Should the model of TCRs paying the costs of their participation be 
retained?

No.  Cover  costs for those especially from Developing world and others who can 
not afford.  Other may not need. So it should be  optional

b.      Would some form of compensation to offset the expenses incurred by the 
TCRs detract from their independence in performing the role?


No.

c.      If you support compensating TCRs for their expenses, are there 
requirements or limitations on whom the funding organization should be?


No.


Thanks

--Alain