<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comments Regarding Expressions of Interest Process
- To: draft-eoi-model@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Comments Regarding Expressions of Interest Process
- From: Jennifer Johnson Hashtag Media <jennifer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:33:11 -0500
Dear ICANN,
I would like to state my comments for the current Expressions of Interest
("EOI") process, and appreciate the opportunity to make my views heard.
OVERALL SUPPORT OR NON-SUPPORT FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
I support Expressions of Interest I've been reading about top-level domains for
years now. I thought things were a lot farther along and I'm surprised to
learn things are stuck. Why the glacial pace? This is the Internet! This
initiative is a good idea to get things moving.
SUBMISSION FEE
There is discussion about the $55,000 (USD) submission fee. I support a high
fee to discourage gaming. If you're going to have to pay $185,000 anyway,
what's the difference? It's not like it doesn't get counted against the
application fee. If anything's unfair, it's the $185,000, but if that's the
fee, then the $55,000 is just part of it.
MANDATORY NATURE OF EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
There is also a question about whether Expressions of Interest should be
mandatory for those applying for a new TLD. New TLD applicants should be
required to submit an EOI. Keep it real and make sure that all the applicants
get counted. I'm definitely for a required submission.
REFUNDS
The current EOI model will provide refunds of the submission fee only in
extraordinary circumstances, or unless ICANN is unable to accept new TLD
applications by a particular date. Refunds should be allowed only in limited
circumstances. I have no problems with refunds in theory, but if anyone can
demand one what's the point of the program. Some scamster will just put in a
bunch of these to flush out the competition, then selectively ask for refunds.
COMMUNICATION PERIOD
ICANN's draft EOI model contemplates a four-month communication period prior to
accepting EOI submissions. Four months is too long for the communications plan.
Like I said, I thought these things were done already. Go ahead and
communicate if it's in the plan but don't take forever. It's not exactly news
anymore.
PUBLICATION OF DATA
Finally, there is a question about whether data collected from EOIs should be
made public. ICANN should publish all strings and applicants. Unless there's
a very good reason not to, everything should be open.
OTHER COMMENTS
Nice form, makes it easy for me to weigh in. Thanks.
Signed,
Jennifer Johnson
Hashtag Media
jennifer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[This comment comes via the ICANN comment form found at
http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/let-icann-know-your-position-on-expressions-of-interest.
This form provides brief descriptions of the issues and allows easy comment
on the Expressions of Interest process.]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|