<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comment from United TLD Holdco. Ltd.
- To: "'drawing-prioritization@xxxxxxxxx'" <drawing-prioritization@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Comment from United TLD Holdco. Ltd.
- From: Statton Hammock <Statton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:59:26 -0800
United TLD Holdco, Ltd. ("United TLD") wishes to submit this comment in
response to ICANN's request for comments on the Use of a Drawing for
Prioritizing New gTLD Applications.
First, United TLD applauds ICANN for proposing a random drawing to determine
the order which new gTLD applications will proceed to contract negotiation,
pre-delegation testing, and final approval and acceptance into the DNS. We
believe that the draw proposal is logical and fair and, most importantly, will
enable the new gTLD program to move forward and stay on the timeline
established by ICANN.
United TLD also supports ICANN's decision to give IDNs priority and allow them
to go first in the draw ahead of other applications. While United TLD
acknowledges ICANN's sound reasons for giving IDNs first priority, it feels
strongly that ICANN should not consider also giving priority to other types of
applications. We are aware that other applicants are now also asking for
priority for their applications but the notion of giving multiple applications
priority seriously undermines and erodes the fairness of the draw proposal and
would also result in further delays to the process.
In addition, although we support the draw proposal, we do not believe that the
draw number should be used to determine the order that applications are
released from initial evaluation. Initial evaluation results should be
released as soon as they are completed. There is no logical basis for holding
back evaluation results simply because of a draw number and doing so makes the
application process less efficient.
United TLD also urges ICANN to reconsider limiting the number of pre-delegation
testing slots to 20 per week. We note that ICANN recently issued an RFP
seeking proposals from one or more pre-delegation testing providers and that
this RFP states that the provider be capable of conducting as many as 100 tests
per week. Furthermore, because many applicants make use of the same technical
backend provider, it should not be necessary to perform pre-delegation testing
for every TLD. Rather, testing should occur only once on each backend
provider, a number that is far fewer than even 20.
Also, on the topic of auctions, United TLD suggests that ICANN conduct all
auctions within 90 days from the date that the last application in a contention
set has completed the initial evaluation process. This will create more
certainty around the string resolution process and the timing of auctions.
Finally, we believe that in order to adhere to the current timeline, it is
crucial that all GAC advice on applications be issued no later than the close
of the ICANN Meeting in Beijing. We ask ICANN to urge the GAC to work
diligently to meet this deadline even if that requires a face-to-face
inter-sessional meeting of the GAC prior to the meeting in Beijing.
Statton Hammock
United TLD Holdco, Ltd.
________________________________
Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc.
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete it from your system. Thank you.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|