Re: [dssa] i stole some of our stuff as rapporteur for the ISPCP comments on ICANN's SSR role and remit
- To: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [dssa] i stole some of our stuff as rapporteur for the ISPCP comments on ICANN's SSR role and remit
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:26:08 -0500
ah ha! i've caught me a live one. somebody who actually knows what's going on.
what *is* the "reply period" anyhow? can you give us the quick and dirty
difference between comment-period and reply-period?
On Jun 15, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Patrick Jones wrote:
> The comment process is a bit confusing. With the reply period included, the
> actual deadline is 16 July, not tomorrow. But early comments are welcomed to
> drive discussion in Prague.
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:19 AM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> hi all,
>> i'd be curious to hear your reactions to the comments we, the GNSO ISPCP
>> constituency, just submitted in response to the request for comments on the
>> proposed SSR role and remit. i "repurposed" some of our cool ideas and
>> drawings spiff them up a bit. you can do that too if you want -- that's why
>> we published the Powerpoint file that has all the pictures in it.
>> here's the link to the "comments received" page (do note how lonely our
>> response is at this moment -- ours is but one of two -- 'seems like there
>> should be more -- deadline is tomorrow).
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)