ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[fast-track-review-2010]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

  • To: fast-track-review-2010@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?
  • From: "George Todoroff" <george_todoroff@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:29:42 -0800

Is really Bulgarian Cyrillic .бг (.bg) similar to other Latin ccTLDs?

        Bulgaria has proposed for an IDN ccTLD the string .бг (Cyrillic
        for .bg, or U+0431 U+0433), but the proposal was turned down by
        the ICANN DNS Stability panel in May 2010 without any arguments
        or an option for appeal.

The proposed string is composed of two characters:
U+0431 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER BE (б) and
U+0433 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER GHE (г)

        Reading the tables, provided with Unicode Technical Standard
        #39,
        (http://www.unicode.org/Public/security/revision-04/confusables.txt)
        I see that confusable characters are only:

0431 ;  0036 ;  SL      # ( б → 6 ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER BE → DIGIT SIX
    # 

0433 ;  0072 ;  ML      # ( г → r ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER GHE → LATIN
SMALL LETTER R # 

        As a result, we see that the applied string .бг could be
        confused only with the string .6r, which does not exist.

The Russian case

        Opponents to the Bulgarian proposal say that Russia first wanted
        to apply for .ру (Cyrillic for .ru), but then selected another
        one, because .ру was found to be confusingly similar with the
        Paraguayan ccTLD .py , and because of this, Bulgaria must be
        obedient and select another IDN string.

        Looking again at Unicode Technical Standard #39, I see that:

0440 ;  0070 ;  ML      # ( р → p ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ER → LATIN
SMALL LETTER P  # 

0443 ;  0079 ;  ML      # ( у → y ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER U → LATIN
SMALL LETTER Y   # 

        We have absolute similarity here! Very different than the
        Bulgarian case with 50% similarity.

        Russia selected and received the .рф (Cyrillic for .rf) string.
        Looking for a third time at Unicode Technical Standard #39, I
        see that:

0440 ;  0070 ;  MA      # ( р → p ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ER → LATIN
SMALL LETTER P  # 

0444 ;  0278 ;  ML      # ( ф → ɸ ) CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EF → LATIN
SMALL LETTER PHI# 

        What do we have here? One similar character, and one not similar
        to a Latin basic character. So, how is this different from the
        Bulgarian case? Its the same! How the Russian string was
        approved, and the Bulgarian – not???


The DNS Stability panel rankings

[6]  Both characters are visually identical to an ISO 646 Basic Version
(ISO 646-BV) character.
[5]  One character is visually identical to, and one character is
visually confusable with, an ISO 646-BV character.
[4]  Both characters are visually confusable with, but neither character
is visually identical to, an ISO 646-BV character.
[3]  One character is visually distinct from, and one character is
visually identical to, an ISO 646-BV character.
[2]  One character is visually distinct from, and one character is
visually confusable with, an ISO 646-BV character.
[1]  Both characters are visually distinct from an ISO 646-BV character.
        
        The panel said that Bulgaria fails under [4] or [5], so the
        string is not accepted, because rank [4] or more is not good.

        But, from my findings here, the Bulgarian (as the Russian)
        strings fail under [2] or [3], and its perfectly fine to be
        approved.

Security proposals

        As another participant in the public comment forum said, two
        security proposals must be implemented:

        “1. All names in the .бг (.bg) IDN ccTLD must be registered only
        with Cyrillic letters.”
        “2. All names in the .бг (.bg) IDN ccTLD must contain at least
        one letter, which can be visually distinguished from the Latin
        alphabet (one of the letters: б, г, д, ж, и, й, л, п, ф, ц, ч,
        ш, щ, ъ, ь, ю, я).” (“г“ may fail off this list, because of my
        findings.)

Examples

        There must be really conservative people in the DNS Stability
        panel, who don`t like seeing domains like:
- раурал.бг because people would confuse it with paypal.br
        Come on, раурал.бг and paypal.br ? Compare with paypal.it and
        paypal.lt ? 

        Others are afraid of seeing:
- руса.бг and pyca.br (whatever this means in Brazilian Portuguese) -
check the second security proposal. The first domain can`t exist.

- - - - -

        Dear DNS Stability panel members, what is wrong here?
        Dear ICANN Board members, Bulgaria needs an appeal procedure!

Cheers,
George Todoroff
-- 
  george_todoroff@xxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy