ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[geo-regions-draft-final-report]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Statement NRO

  • To: geo-regions-draft-final-report@xxxxxxxxx, robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Statement NRO
  • From: Andres Piazza <andres@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:12:22 -0200


Dear All, It is my pleasure to submit a NRO Statement:


--------------

*
*

*Statement of The NRO on Draft for Final Report of ICANN Geographic Regions*


First of all, the NRO recognizes the efforts of the Working Group in trying to find a consistent standard for the allocation of countries into regions in order to maintain geographical diversity in the composition of the ICANN Board and ICANN's organizational structures.

The NRO understands the Working Group's recommendations for ICANN to maintain an ad-hoc standard and implement it flexibly; the rationale of not expanding the number of available regions; and the importance of allowing countries to assert their sovereignty and self-determination.

The NRO also notes that the RIR model has been suggested by the Working Group as the starting point for a revised regional framework for ICANN. While the NRO does not oppose this recommendation, we wish to make the following clarifications.

As stated in the Draft Final Report, neither of the two ASO representatives on the WG proposed, advocated or endorsed the use of the RIR model as a framework to be used by ICANN. The NRO stresses that we have no interest in the use of its model as the new geographic framework for ICANN, and that this is a matter entirely for the affected stakeholders.The RIR system was created as a result of a community-based bottom-up policy development processes and has evolved with the aim of ensuring a fair distribution of IP address space globally, and to minimize address space fragmentation.

If the RIR model is considered by the ICANN community as a useful starting point to update its geographic regions, this is a fortunate coincidence but certainly not an intended or expected application of the model. Further, the RIR geographical framework is not fixed and may continue evolving over time according to our community-based bottom-up participatory policy development processes. Moreover, The ASO's MoU, signed in 2004 between ICANN and The NRO establishes at its Article 6 that the Service Regions shall be defined by the RIRs in a manner of their choosing.

While the Draft Final Report suggests the use of the RIR model "as a starting point for a revised regional framework at ICANN", it does not mention how changes in the RIR system may affect the ICANN geographic framework in the future. Perhaps a Final Version could expand more on this possible scenario.

Again, the NRO commends the hard work of the Working Group and shares its commitment to find improved ways to maintain geographic diversity at all levels of ICANN.


----------


Warmest Regards,


Andrés Piazza
Chairman - Public Affairs Coordination Group
The NRO



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy